On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 09:21:39 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
This is apparently a known issue:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18979
which is basically just a special case of this issue:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2775
--
Simen
I see. Looks like the chances of i
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 08:52:50 UTC, Ritchie wrote:
I apologize for not making it clear. I was talking about the
private constructor only. The @disable this() is there to
prevent struct literal syntax and the other disables really
have no reason to be there for the purpose of this quest
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 08:14:44 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 07:31:21 UTC, Ritchie wrote:
Any reason why this works?
https://run.dlang.io/is/TALlyw
Yup.
Alright, so there's a few features in use here - which one are
you asking about?
1. Private construc
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 07:31:21 UTC, Ritchie wrote:
Any reason why this works?
https://run.dlang.io/is/TALlyw
Yup.
Alright, so there's a few features in use here - which one are
you asking about?
1. Private constructor.
You can call the private constructor because the unit of
enc
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 07:55:48 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 07:31:21 UTC, Ritchie wrote:
Any reason why this works?
https://run.dlang.io/is/TALlyw
Why not?
The constructor is private.
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 07:31:21 UTC, Ritchie wrote:
Any reason why this works?
https://run.dlang.io/is/TALlyw
"private" applies to the module, not the type.
https://dlang.org/spec/attribute.html#visibility_attributes
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 07:31:21 UTC, Ritchie wrote:
Any reason why this works?
https://run.dlang.io/is/TALlyw
Why not?
Any reason why this works?
https://run.dlang.io/is/TALlyw
