Probably normal, see this discussion:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.400.1389749305.15871.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
Anyway dmd is not known to have a quality backend, try ldc or gdc.
On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 at 13:17:22 UTC, chmike wrote:
After closer examination it seam that the second line with 9 is
a bogus insertion. Removing it should fix the code line table.
app.d 9
0x43aafb
app.d 11
After closer examination it seam that the second line with 9 is a
bogus insertion. Removing it should fix the code line table.
app.d 90x43aafb
app.d 110x43aafe
app.d
Hello,
I've notice that gdb was improperly displaying source lines with
disassembled code.
I looked at the assembly to check what is inlined and what not
and the difference between the use of is and == in the machine
code.
I then tested with objdump with a simple program and saw the same
pr
Here you have the object lines from app with the addresses.
./app.d:[++]
app.d 30x43aae8
app.d 50x43aaf0
app.d 70x43aaf7
app.d
