Re: TickDuration depreciated, yet stopwatch not?
On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 19:17:00 Joerg Joergonson via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > Stopwatch depends on TickDuration and TickDuration is depreciated > yet Stopwatch isn't and hasn't been converted to MonoTime... > makes sense? TickDuration does have a note in its documentation about how it's
TickDuration depreciated, yet stopwatch not?
Stopwatch depends on TickDuration and TickDuration is depreciated yet Stopwatch isn't and hasn't been converted to MonoTime... makes sense?