On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 05:21:26 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
Instead of removing `in`/`const` from the ref overload, you can
also add it to the non-ref overload. Again, the overloads will
have the same match level ("match with conversion to const"),
and the ref version will win.
It works. I do
On 04/28/2017 06:46 AM, ANtlord wrote:
struct MyStruct
{
@disable this(this);
int a;
}
void process(MyStruct obj) {
writeln("incoming rvalue");
}
void process(in ref MyStruct obj) {
writeln("incoming lvalue");
}
void main()
{
MyStruct obj = {a: 1};
process(obj);
}
Text
On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 04:46:00 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
Does make sense for me because it is more obvious in client
code, but I want to understand reason of error pointed above.
Typo fix.
It makes sense for me*
Hello! Short time ago I've met strange thing at least for me. I
have a non-copyable structure and two methods for it with same
name. I mean that I use function overloading.
First method takes rvalue of this structure. Second method takes
constant lvalue structure. But when I try to use this fu
