On 6/12/17 11:31 AM, Arafel wrote:
As you can see, the only change is the type the function returns, but I
don't see how it should make any difference.
Also, changing from "enum" to "static immutable", or even removing the
"enum" and directly embedding the function literal doesn't seem to make
Well, I had kind of found a workaround (changing the return type to
return the element and not the index) which I didn't like too much (what
if there are duplicates?).
Now that I've found a "proper" workaround well, I'm still interested
in knowing the reason, if possible, or if it's a
Arafel wrote:
I actually found a workaround for the original issue:
yeah, sorry for not proposing a workaround: i thought that you already did
it, and now you're just interested why the original code doesn't work. ;-)
i think that this is a bug (or, rather, unimplemented feature).
On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 19:23:10 UTC, ketmar wrote:
p.s.: while i understand the technical reason for second error
message, it is still random and confusing.
I think the reason for the typeof problem is that it works with
expressions, not with types (so, typeof (int) is also not valid),
p.s.: while i understand the technical reason for second error message, it
is still random and confusing.
more funny compiler messages:
alias xx = size_t function (int[]);
struct S1(T, typeof(xx) X) {}
void main() {
S1!(int, defaultChooser!int) s;
}
Error: type uint function(int[]) is not an expression
but:
struct S2(T, typeof(defaultChooser!T)
On 06/12/2017 05:31 PM, Arafel wrote:
Hi,
I've found a strange problem, and I'm not sure if it's a bug. To give a
bit of background, I'm implementing a multi-threaded producer-consumer
where the next work item to be picked depends not only on the "waiting
queue", but also on what else is
Hi,
I've found a strange problem, and I'm not sure if it's a bug. To give a
bit of background, I'm implementing a multi-threaded producer-consumer
where the next work item to be picked depends not only on the "waiting
queue", but also on what else is being run (and potentially where) at
the
