On Thursday, 15 March 2018 at 15:48:52 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 22:58:25 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
You can probably get around the (manually maintained?)
`FIELDS` array with `.tupleof` or something similar:
static foreach (i, f; S.tupleof)
{
case
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 22:58:25 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
You can probably get around the (manually maintained?) `FIELDS`
array with `.tupleof` or something similar:
static foreach (i, f; S.tupleof)
{
case __traits(identifier, f):
}
Any pointers / design patterns on this
On 03/14/2018 11:13 PM, James Blachly wrote:
Suppose I have a struct (which is really a memory map of a data file I
am reading in) with too many data members to reasonably code
getters/setters for by hand. I wish to either retrieve individual
values or set individual values, which could be
For context, please keep in mind I am coming from a python
background, but am very much enjoying strong typing, although it
is taking some significant adjustment.
Suppose I have a struct (which is really a memory map of a data
file I am reading in) with too many data members to reasonably
