On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 17:54:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
XML is evil.
Agreed!
I'm going with TOML, community package. It's working, so far.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 03:59:52PM +, Adam D Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 15:37:56 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
> > Why not XML? :) It has comments, you can use backslashes too.
>
> no kidding, xml is an underrated format.
XML is evil.
Let me qualify
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 15:37:56 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
Why not XML? :) It has comments, you can use backslashes too.
no kidding, xml is an underrated format.
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 06:38:46 UTC, Daren Scot Wilson
wrote:
I just realized - it's been ages since I've dealt with config
files, beyond editing them as an end user. I work on existing
software where someone else made the choiced and wrote the
code, or it's a small specialized project
On Monday, 30 January 2023 at 06:38:46 UTC, Daren Scot Wilson
wrote:
So, which package do I use for TOML?
I find these three:
* toml-foolery (Andrej Petrović)
* toml-d, or toml.d (oglu on github) at ver 0.3.0
* toml, (dlang community on github) at ver 2.0.1
I'm guessing from version numbers
So, which package do I use for TOML?
I find these three:
* toml-foolery (Andrej Petrović)
* toml-d, or toml.d (oglu on github) at ver 0.3.0
* toml, (dlang community on github) at ver 2.0.1
I'm guessing from version numbers that the third one, toml, is
officially good for real world use. But