On Sunday, 7 July 2019 at 18:45:14 UTC, 0xEAB wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2019 at 16:51:57 UTC, 0xEAB wrote:
Why does this `static foreach` lead to hidden usage of operator
Further notes by Dan (aka "Wild"):
I added some small printfs to the compiler, http://ix.io/1NWM
It seems like it lowers
On Sunday, 7 July 2019 at 16:51:57 UTC, 0xEAB wrote:
Why does this `static foreach` lead to hidden usage of operator
Further notes by Dan (aka "Wild"):
I added some small printfs to the compiler, http://ix.io/1NWM
It seems like it lowers it into something weird
On Sunday, 7 July 2019 at 17:07:59 UTC, a11e99z wrote:
On Sunday, 7 July 2019 at 16:51:57 UTC, 0xEAB wrote:
Why does this `static foreach` lead to hidden usage of
operator `~=` calls in some cases?
probably same
oops! this one
On Sunday, 7 July 2019 at 16:51:57 UTC, 0xEAB wrote:
Why does this `static foreach` lead to hidden usage of operator
`~=` calls in some cases?
probably same
https://forum.dlang.org/post/qd9ee0$2eud$1...@digitalmars.com
Why does this `static foreach` lead to hidden usage of operator
`~=` calls in some cases?
static foreach(i; 0 .. cnt)
onlineapp.d(9): Error: cannot use operator ~= in @nogc delegate
onlineapp.xv!(myUDA("/")).__funcliteral2.__lambda1
import std.traits;
private @safe pure nothrow @nogc
