On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 15:29:29 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 15:18:17 UTC, Michael wrote:
I've not seen that either, though I'm not a C++ programmer.
Does using free() on its own not assume access of a global
namespace?
Consider the following:
class Foo {
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 15:18:17 UTC, Michael wrote:
I've not seen that either, though I'm not a C++ programmer.
Does using free() on its own not assume access of a global
namespace?
Consider the following:
class Foo {
void free(void*);
void other_method() {
free(ptr); //
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 14:15:40 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 14:03:56 UTC, Michael wrote:
So this might be a bit of a stupid question, but looking at
the DMD source code (dmodule.d in particular) I see the
following code:
[...]
and I was just wondering why
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 14:03:56 UTC, Michael wrote:
So this might be a bit of a stupid question, but looking at the
DMD source code (dmodule.d in particular) I see the following
code:
if (srcfile._ref == 0)
.free(srcfile.buffer);
srcfile.buffer = null;
srcfile.len = 0;
and I was
So this might be a bit of a stupid question, but looking at the
DMD source code (dmodule.d in particular) I see the following
code:
if (srcfile._ref == 0)
.free(srcfile.buffer);
srcfile.buffer = null;
srcfile.len = 0;
and I was just wondering why certain functions seem to be called
