On 10/17/20 12:00 AM, Paul Backus wrote:
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 00:06:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Appender is ref counted IIRC.
It's not; it uses the GC.
Oh yeah. In fact, it was me who did that (in 2010!).
My point should have been that the appender is a pImpl to avoid
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 00:06:31 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Appender is ref counted IIRC.
-Steve
It's not; it uses the GC.
On 10/16/20 5:40 PM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Why is `Appender`'s store `Data` put directly as
`private Data* _data;`
instead of
`private Data _data;`
?
Removing the pointer indirection would give better locality.
If it's about optimizing for empty `Appender`s then a `Appender*` should
Why is `Appender`'s store `Data` put directly as
`private Data* _data;`
instead of
`private Data _data;`
?
Removing the pointer indirection would give better locality.
If it's about optimizing for empty `Appender`s then a `Appender*`
should be used in those cases instead.
