Re: Why is it hard to make Qt bindings?

2018-07-07 Thread MGW via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thursday, 5 July 2018 at 08:42:39 UTC, drug wrote: There were several attempts to make Qt binding for dlang ... QtE 5 works great on Win32/64, Linux 32/64 and Mac OS x 64. The main difference is that Qt5 uses a set of pre-defined slots and signals rather than creating them using a MOC or c

Re: Why is it hard to make Qt bindings?

2018-07-05 Thread Tony via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thursday, 5 July 2018 at 12:52:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On 7/5/18 4:42 AM, drug wrote: There were several attempts to make Qt binding for dlang, but either they has failed or has been stalled. It would be nice to collect that experience. Considering 2.081 supports C++ special mem

Re: Why is it hard to make Qt bindings?

2018-07-05 Thread Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thursday, July 05, 2018 11:42:39 drug via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > There were several attempts to make Qt binding for dlang, but either > they has failed or has been stalled. It would be nice to collect that > experience. Considering 2.081 supports C++ special member (not all but > majority)

Re: Why is it hard to make Qt bindings?

2018-07-05 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Thursday, 5 July 2018 at 12:52:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: I remember there being a project for qt for D a long time ago. I think this is it: http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd You may find some way to resurrect this. And QtE5 is still active. He announced support for QML not to

Re: Why is it hard to make Qt bindings?

2018-07-05 Thread Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
On 7/5/18 4:42 AM, drug wrote: There were several attempts to make Qt binding for dlang, but either they has failed or has been stalled. It would be nice to collect that experience. Considering 2.081 supports C++ special member (not all but majority) isn't it time to make another attempt or the

Why is it hard to make Qt bindings?

2018-07-05 Thread drug via Digitalmars-d-learn
There were several attempts to make Qt binding for dlang, but either they has failed or has been stalled. It would be nice to collect that experience. Considering 2.081 supports C++ special member (not all but majority) isn't it time to make another attempt or the problem is more complex? Coul