On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 15:45:00 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
wrote:
John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 15:02:02 UTC, Shriramana
Sharma
wrote:
What binary arithmetic operators do you need that real[]
doesn't
already support?
OMG silly me! I can already do a[] /= b[]... D
John Colvin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 15:02:02 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
> wrote:
> What binary arithmetic operators do you need that real[] doesn't
> already support?
OMG silly me! I can already do a[] /= b[]... D is great! :-D Thanks a lot!
on operator
overloading allowed at the global level (even within a single
module), and searched through the forum and saw this thread:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/jeyaozvegcnivcppu...@forum.dlang.org
Why isn't global operator overloading allowed in D?
Having to construct a class just to
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 15:02:02 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
wrote:
Hello. I just came upon a need in my program to make binary
arithmetic operators valid between two real[] in my programs
What binary arithmetic operators do you need that real[] doesn't
already support?
lowed at the global level (even within a
> single module), and searched through the forum and saw this thread:
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/jeyaozvegcnivcppu...@forum.dlang.org
>
> Why isn't global operator overloading allowed in D?
Hmm, just now saw this one too:
http://forum
single
module), and searched through the forum and saw this thread:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/jeyaozvegcnivcppu...@forum.dlang.org
Why isn't global operator overloading allowed in D?
Having to construct a class just to write a quick operator overload for two
built-in types isn't a clea
