On Friday, 15 November 2019 at 11:32:07 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
TBH I see your point but D is a system programming language.
Even if there's a GC you can also do Manual Memory Mangement
(sometimes you'll see "MMM "to refer to that in the forums),
RC, and you can also write custom machine code i
On Friday, 15 November 2019 at 10:55:55 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Friday, 15 November 2019 at 08:58:43 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 11:07:12 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
I'm trying to find the rationale why GC pointers (should be
names managed pointers) are using the exact same type
On Friday, 15 November 2019 at 08:58:43 UTC, user1234 wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 11:07:12 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
I'm trying to find the rationale why GC pointers (should be
names managed pointers) are using the exact same type as any
other pointer.
Doesn't this limit the ability to
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 11:07:12 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
I'm trying to find the rationale why GC pointers (should be
names managed pointers) are using the exact same type as any
other pointer.
Doesn't this limit the ability to change the default GC type?
Doesn't this confusion make GC poi
On Thursday, 14 November 2019 at 01:08:58 UTC, Suleyman wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 16:43:27 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
Best example is probably managed C++, an MS extension to C++
which is now deprecated.
MS Managed C++ was superseded by C++/CLI[1] which was
standardized. They actually
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 16:43:27 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 15:30:33 UTC, Dukc wrote:
I'm not 100% sure what managed pointers mean -Are they so that
you can't pass them to unregistered memory? A library solution
would likely do -wrap the pointer in a struct
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 16:43:27 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
Best example is probably managed C++, an MS extension to C++
which is now deprecated.
MS Managed C++ was superseded by C++/CLI[1] which was
standardized. They actually retained the special syntax for GC
pointers.
One of the motivat
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 15:30:33 UTC, Dukc wrote:
I'm not 100% sure what managed pointers mean -Are they so that
you can't pass them to unregistered memory? A library solution
would likely do -wrap the pointer in a struct and make it
@system to extract it's pointer as "raw". So you
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 11:07:12 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
I'm trying to find the rationale why GC pointers (should be
names managed pointers) are using the exact same type as any
other pointer.
Doesn't this limit the ability to change the default GC type?
What does grabage collector type
On Wednesday, 13 November 2019 at 11:07:12 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
I'm trying to find the rationale why GC pointers (should be
names managed pointers) are using the exact same type as any
other pointer.
I assume you mean a GC that scans (not ref counting). GC pointers
only need to be protected fro
I'm trying to find the rationale why GC pointers (should be names
managed pointers) are using the exact same type as any other
pointer.
Doesn't this limit the ability to change the default GC type?
Doesn't this confusion make GC pointers just as unsafe as raw
pointers?
Has there been any prior
11 matches
Mail list logo
