On 6/15/18 7:56 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 11:48:59 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 11:25:49 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Hello, i've tested locally and it can works by making
`Appender.reserve()` and `Appender.ensureAddable()` function templates.
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 11:48:59 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 11:25:49 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Hello, i've tested locally and it can works by making
`Appender.reserve()` and `Appender.ensureAddable()` function
templates.
That was my idea too. But I wonder if
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 11:25:49 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
Hello, i've tested locally and it can works by making
`Appender.reserve()` and `Appender.ensureAddable()` function
templates.
That was my idea too. But I wonder if pureness of reserve and
ensureAddable have a particular reason.
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 11:24:42 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 11:15:03 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Check this code:
https://run.dlang.io/is/PoluHI
It won't work, because array appender requires a pure postblit.
Why? Can we remove this limitation?
Andrea
Hello, i've
On Friday, 15 June 2018 at 11:15:03 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
Check this code:
https://run.dlang.io/is/PoluHI
It won't work, because array appender requires a pure postblit.
Why? Can we remove this limitation?
Andrea
Hello, i've tested locally and it can works by making
Check this code:
https://run.dlang.io/is/PoluHI
It won't work, because array appender requires a pure postblit.
Why? Can we remove this limitation?
Andrea
