Re: compiler does not detect accessing on null class object.

2019-05-27 Thread dangbinghoo via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Monday, 27 May 2019 at 15:29:32 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:

On Monday, 27 May 2019 at 15:13:00 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:

hello,




1.)
Yes this is by design. It is not easy to detect this at compile 
time.

It does not break safety

2.)
https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#function-safety
https://dlang.org/spec/memory-safe-d.html
https://dlang.org/articles/safed.html#safed-subset


thanks a lot.

so, The SafeD Subset consists of [function-safety, memory-safety].


Re: compiler does not detect accessing on null class object.

2019-05-27 Thread Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-learn

On Monday, 27 May 2019 at 15:13:00 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:

hello,

code below:
-
class a  {
string a1;
}

a a1;
writeln(a1.a1);
-

compiles and produce "core dump" or "segfault", does this fit 
the original D design? why the compiler does not detect for 
accessing a null object and refused to compile?




And, 2nd question: where can I find the Subset spec of SafeD?


Thanks!

--
binghoo dang



1.)
Yes this is by design. It is not easy to detect this at compile 
time.

It does not break safety

2.)
https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#function-safety
https://dlang.org/spec/memory-safe-d.html
https://dlang.org/articles/safed.html#safed-subset




compiler does not detect accessing on null class object.

2019-05-27 Thread dangbinghoo via Digitalmars-d-learn

hello,

code below:
-
class a  {
string a1;
}

a a1;
writeln(a1.a1);
-

compiles and produce "core dump" or "segfault", does this fit the 
original D design? why the compiler does not detect for accessing 
a null object and refused to compile?




And, 2nd question: where can I find the Subset spec of SafeD?


Thanks!

--
binghoo dang