On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:26:06 -0400, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
I think a member initializer has to be a constant expression, like int
i =
1. Anything else has to be done in the constructor.
There are the static constructors too, for modules,
Hi, I have a problem with a mixin template. More exact with an
Arraylist!T within a mixin template.
Given.
void main() {
auto p = new Person(Hans, 32);
p ~= new Person(Steve, 40);
p ~= new Person(Bjoern, 101);
}
class Person {
private string _name;
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:36:53 -0400, BLS windev...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi, I have a problem with a mixin template. More exact with an
Arraylist!T within a mixin template.
Given.
void main() {
auto p = new Person(Hans, 32);
p ~= new Person(Steve, 40);
p ~= new
On 01/07/2010 22:59, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:36:53 -0400, BLS windev...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hi, I have a problem with a mixin template. More exact with an
Arraylist!T within a mixin template.
Given.
void main() {
auto p = new Person(Hans, 32);
p ~= new Person(Steve,
Steven Schveighoffer:
I think a member initializer has to be a constant expression, like int i =
1. Anything else has to be done in the constructor.
There are the static constructors too, for modules, structs, classes.
Bye,
bearophile
On 02/07/2010 00:26, bearophile wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
I think a member initializer has to be a constant expression, like int i =
1. Anything else has to be done in the constructor.
There are the static constructors too, for modules, structs, classes.
Bye,
bearophile
Hi bearophile,
BLS:
I don't understand (in this context) . Can you please elaborate a bit more ?
I have not shown you code because I don't understand your context. But you can
put inside static this() {...} code that can't be run statically, like the
initialization of a run-time thing.
Bye,
bearophile
