On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 20:36:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
My apologies. The code was written for an older version of dmd.
The simplest fix is to define the constructor as pure:
pure this(int num) {
this.num = num;
}
Ali
Ahh great thanks guys.
No worries Ali, great book,
On 05/16/2014 01:37 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:36:36 -0400, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Beat you by 8 seconds :)
-Steve
I am happy to be within one minute. :)
Ali
On 05/16/2014 01:28 PM, Joshua Niehus wrote:
> trying to follow:
> http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/class.html
>
> //--- OSX 10.9 DMD 2.065
> module test;
>
> class Foo {
> int num;
>
> this(int num) {
> this.num = num;
> }
>
> Foo dup() const {
> return new
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:36:36 -0400, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Beat you by 8 seconds :)
-Steve
On Fri, 16 May 2014 16:28:41 -0400, Joshua Niehus
wrote:
trying to follow:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/class.html
//--- OSX 10.9 DMD 2.065
module test;
class Foo {
int num;
this(int num) {
this.num = num;
}
Foo dup() const {
return new Foo(this.n
trying to follow:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/class.html
//--- OSX 10.9 DMD 2.065
module test;
class Foo {
int num;
this(int num) {
this.num = num;
}
Foo dup() const {
return new Foo(this.num);
}
immutable(Foo) idup() const {
return new
