On Friday, 16 August 2019 at 16:22:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
Thanks very much again, very helpful explain.
I use pass by ref scope instead "return TreeRange.__ctor();" to
workround this issue.
On Friday, August 16, 2019 8:14:52 AM MDT Newbie2019 via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 16 August 2019 at 13:51:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > It is not possible to prevent moving in D as things currently
> > stand. DIP 1014 will need to be implemented to either hook into
> > moves
On Friday, 16 August 2019 at 13:51:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It is not possible to prevent moving in D as things currently
stand. DIP 1014 will need to be implemented to either hook into
moves or to prevent them. However, once DIP 1014 has been
implemented, I would expect the result to
On Friday, August 16, 2019 6:29:19 AM MDT Newbie2019 via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 16 August 2019 at 12:23:01 UTC, Newbie2019 wrote:
> > I has this simple function has some memory bugs:
> >
> > ---
> > struct TreeRange {
> >
> > @disable this() ;
> > @disable this(this)
On Friday, 16 August 2019 at 12:23:01 UTC, Newbie2019 wrote:
I has this simple function has some memory bugs:
---
struct TreeRange {
@disable this() ;
@disable this(this) ;
}
struct Tree {
ref auto getRange() return scope {
return TreeRange!T(_root);
I has this simple function has some memory bugs:
---
struct TreeRange {
@disable this() ;
@disable this(this) ;
}
struct Tree {
ref auto getRange() return scope {
return TreeRange!T(_root);
}
}
Tree tree;
auto range = tree.getRange();
--
