Re: static foreach not working with this
On Monday, 7 January 2019 at 16:31:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/7/19 11:16 AM, Michelle Long wrote:
On Monday, 7 January 2019 at 16:01:50 UTC, Michelle Long wrote:
[...]
static foreach(k, p; AliasSeq!(Alias!this, s))
{{
p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed
}}
To expand on Michelle's cryptic response, the second form
(using `Alias!this` instead of `this`) DOES work!
I think this is a bug. If the latter works, the former should.
Please file at issues.dlang.org with a complete example.
-Steve
Ah, yes.
Re: static foreach not working with this
On Monday, 7 January 2019 at 16:29:25 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Monday, 7 January 2019 at 16:16:57 UTC, Michelle Long wrote:
On Monday, 7 January 2019 at 16:01:50 UTC, Michelle Long wrote:
static foreach(k, p; AliasSeq!(this, s))
{{
p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed
}}
this not known at compile time. replace s with this and it
works! s is an argument which is also not known at compile
time(generally).
Should work with this.
Just "simplifying"
this.foo();
s.foo();
(obviously more complex code)
static foreach(k, p; AliasSeq!(Alias!this, s))
{{
p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed
}}
referring to
https://forum.dlang.org/post/aqypsijjvajybtqtm...@forum.dlang.org
Do you trying to do a recursive call from foo to itself?
foo has nothing to do with it, as I said, removing it produces
the same error['p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed'].
I only put in something in the block because some blockhead would
say something if there was nothing there like "Why are you even
bothering with a static for each on an empty block? are you that
stupid that you don't realize the compiler won't emit any code?".
Re: static foreach not working with this
On 1/7/19 11:16 AM, Michelle Long wrote:
On Monday, 7 January 2019 at 16:01:50 UTC, Michelle Long wrote:
static foreach(k, p; AliasSeq!(this, s))
{{
p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed
}}
this not known at compile time. replace s with this and it works! s is
an argument which is also not known at compile time(generally).
Should work with this.
Just "simplifying"
this.foo();
s.foo();
(obviously more complex code)
static foreach(k, p; AliasSeq!(Alias!this, s))
{{
p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed
}}
To expand on Michelle's cryptic response, the second form (using
`Alias!this` instead of `this`) DOES work!
I think this is a bug. If the latter works, the former should. Please
file at issues.dlang.org with a complete example.
-Steve
Re: static foreach not working with this
On Monday, 7 January 2019 at 16:16:57 UTC, Michelle Long wrote:
On Monday, 7 January 2019 at 16:01:50 UTC, Michelle Long wrote:
static foreach(k, p; AliasSeq!(this, s))
{{
p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed
}}
this not known at compile time. replace s with this and it
works! s is an argument which is also not known at compile
time(generally).
Should work with this.
Just "simplifying"
this.foo();
s.foo();
(obviously more complex code)
static foreach(k, p; AliasSeq!(Alias!this, s))
{{
p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed
}}
referring to
https://forum.dlang.org/post/aqypsijjvajybtqtm...@forum.dlang.org
Do you trying to do a recursive call from foo to itself?
Re: static foreach not working with this
On Monday, 7 January 2019 at 16:01:50 UTC, Michelle Long wrote:
static foreach(k, p; AliasSeq!(this, s))
{{
p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed
}}
this not known at compile time. replace s with this and it
works! s is an argument which is also not known at compile
time(generally).
Should work with this.
Just "simplifying"
this.foo();
s.foo();
(obviously more complex code)
static foreach(k, p; AliasSeq!(Alias!this, s))
{{
p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed
}}
static foreach not working with this
static foreach(k, p; AliasSeq!(this, s))
{{
p.foo(); // Fails even if this line is removed
}}
this not known at compile time. replace s with this and it works!
s is an argument which is also not known at compile
time(generally).
Should work with this.
Just "simplifying"
this.foo();
s.foo();
(obviously more complex code)
