On 31/12/2011 13:34, Trass3r wrote:
Basically it was deprecated because it's poorly defined and implemented.
snip
Would you care to elaborate? Moreover, if that's the only reason then
why not improve it rather than getting rid of it?
There are several types of typedefs that need to be
On 30/12/2011 10:35, Stephan wrote:
is there a template or something in phobos to get the same typesafe
behaviour of good old typedef ?
Could someone please provide a link to the thread with the reasons for
deprecating typedef? There are too many threads with the words
typedef and deprecate
is there a template or something in phobos to get the same typesafe
behaviour of good old typedef ?
S.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Stephan s...@extrawurst.org wrote:
is there a template or something in phobos to get the same typesafe
behaviour of good old typedef ?
S.
Get over it, move on, and hope they fix the thousands of bugs left in DMD.
P.S.
use `alias`.
is there a template or something in phobos to get the same typesafe
behaviour of good old typedef ?
I've brought this up several times.
People just don't give a shit.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5467
On Friday, December 30, 2011 11:35:28 Stephan wrote:
is there a template or something in phobos to get the same typesafe
behaviour of good old typedef ?
There's a pull request being reviewed but nothing in Phobos yet.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/300
- Jonathan M
On 30.12.2011 12:09, Trass3r wrote:
is there a template or something in phobos to get the same typesafe
behaviour of good old typedef ?
I've brought this up several times.
People just don't give a shit.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5467
thats too bad. pull request looks
2011/12/30 Stephan s...@extrawurst.org:
On 30.12.2011 12:09, Trass3r wrote:
is there a template or something in phobos to get the same typesafe
behaviour of good old typedef ?
I've brought this up several times.
People just don't give a shit.
