On Tuesday, 16 June 2020 at 06:19:51 UTC, Joel wrote:
I've tired different unit test libraries, but they jump out on
errors instead of just adding to failed numbers.
I'm thinking like this:
```
@("dummy");
unittset {
0.shouldEqual(0);
1.shouldEqual(2);
2.shouldEqual(3);
}
```
Test: dumm
On Tuesday, 16 June 2020 at 07:39:20 UTC, Luis wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 June 2020 at 06:19:51 UTC, Joel wrote:
[...]
I understand that where the trivial test code is placed, must
be something more complex being tested.
@("dummy test 1");
unittest {
/// Some test code that runs fine
}
@("du
On Tuesday, 16 June 2020 at 06:19:51 UTC, Joel wrote:
I've tired different unit test libraries, but they jump out on
errors instead of just adding to failed numbers.
I'm thinking like this:
```
@("dummy");
unittset {
0.shouldEqual(0);
1.shouldEqual(2);
2.shouldEqual(3);
}
```
Test: dumm
On Tuesday, 16 June 2020 at 06:19:51 UTC, Joel wrote:
I've tired different unit test libraries, but they jump out on
errors instead of just adding to failed numbers.
I'm thinking like this:
```
@("dummy");
unittset {
0.shouldEqual(0);
1.shouldEqual(2);
2.shouldEqual(3);
}
```
Test: dumm
I've tired different unit test libraries, but they jump out on
errors instead of just adding to failed numbers.
I'm thinking like this:
```
@("dummy");
unittset {
0.shouldEqual(0);
1.shouldEqual(2);
2.shouldEqual(3);
}
```
Test: dummy
test passed line 10: 0 is equal to 0
test failed line
