On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:34:18 -0500, pompei2 pomp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 December 2011 at 16:05:24 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
Can't really answer your original question, but
1. Why don't you use opApply?
2. Why do you use ref int even in the const version?
3. You could also use alias
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:54:06 -0500, pompei2 pomp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I want to add the option to iterate objects of my class using foreach. I
need them to be iterable as view-only const and as mutable too. I would
prefer to iterate using the return a delegate but if that's not
Hello.
I want to add the option to iterate objects of my class using
foreach. I need them to be iterable as view-only const and as
mutable too. I would prefer to iterate using the return a
delegate but if that's not possible, ranges are fine too. Also,
I'd prefer a template-less solution
Can't really answer your original question, but
1. Why don't you use opApply?
2. Why do you use ref int even in the const version?
3. You could also use alias this to allow iteration, don't know if that's
what you want in general though.
On 12/21/2011 04:54 PM, pompei2 wrote:
Hello.
I want to add the option to iterate objects of my class using foreach. I
need them to be iterable as view-only const and as mutable too. I would
prefer to iterate using the return a delegate but if that's not
possible, ranges are fine too. Also, I'd
On Wednesday, 21 December 2011 at 16:31:01 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 December 2011 at 16:07:55 UTC, Timon Gehr
wrote:
Just remove the non-const overload. const member functions
work with mutable, immutable and const receivers.
The const version does not allow using 'ref' when
On Wednesday, 21 December 2011 at 16:05:24 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
Can't really answer your original question, but
1. Why don't you use opApply?
2. Why do you use ref int even in the const version?
3. You could also use alias this to allow iteration, don't know
if that's what you want in general
On Wednesday, 21 December 2011 at 16:07:55 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Just remove the non-const overload. const member functions work
with mutable, immutable and const receivers.
The const version does not allow using 'ref' when iterating.
pompei2 , dans le message (digitalmars.D.learn:31164), a écrit :
This is what I have, which works but has severe code duplication.
I hoped inout would help me here, but I just can't figure it out.
I also gave a try to ranges, but same thing again: I can only get
it to work if I define my
