On 2011-05-16 15:43, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Instead you move the view layer into the model or controller
layer. How's that any different?
Is that really what's happening? Any template has variables made
available to it from the model. I'm just making them available
at a higher level (pre-wrapped
Andrej Mitrovic:
I don't think the compiler can figure that one out unless tuples
become a standard language feature, not a library one. But maybe I'm
wrong.
Turning tuples into a a _partial_ language feature will be a good thing [TM]
for D. Tuples are useful in many situations, and they are
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:iqt6kb$1nd1$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2011-05-16 15:43, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Instead you move the view layer into the model or controller
layer. How's that any different?
Is that really what's happening? Any template has variables made
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:iqtarl$229l$1...@digitalmars.com...
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:iqt6kb$1nd1$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2011-05-16 15:43, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Instead you move the view layer into the model or controller
layer. How's that any
On 2011-05-17 10:11, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote in message
news:iqt6kb$1nd1$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2011-05-16 15:43, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Instead you move the view layer into the model or controller
layer. How's that any different?
Is that really what's
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
That would require a lot of otherwise (possibly) unnecessary
id/class attributes (if they aren't removed).
Not that much in the sites I've done.
Here's another real example, that new d web site discussed on the
newsgroup a while ago:
Dynamic page:
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:iqua65$rm2$1...@digitalmars.com...
auto f = cast(Form) document.getElementById(code-runner);
f.setValue(code, `void main() { assert(0, Hello, world!); }`);
Minor suggestion:
There should be an overload of getElementById that's
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
There should be an overload of getElementById that's defined like
this:
Aye, I've been thinking about that for a while, but could never think
of a name I like (yeah, petty reason).
I've just trained myself to use assert to avoid the null pointers.
Or maybe call it
On 17/05/2011 04:40, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
auto foo()
{
if (1)
{
return [0, 0];
}
else
{
size_t one;
size_t two;
return [one, two];
}
}
void main(){ }
Error: mismatched function return type inference of
uint[] and int[]
Bug is in bugzilla: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6022
I'm not a compiler writer though, sorry. :)
I would love to post a bug with a minimum test case, so that I'd be able to
identify if its my fault, the compiler, or libraries I'm using. But at this
time I can't seem to reduce it to a reasonable (non-proprietary) portion of
code. So for now I'll just rant.
I combining much here. I have two
Could it be a stack corruption?
On Wed, 18 May 2011 02:18:22 +0300, Jesse Phillips
jessekphillip...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip memory corruption rant]
I've nothing to contribute but by own anecdotal experience. So: are you
doing *any* allocations or throwing exceptions in finalizers (destructors
of objects on the heap)?
On Sun, 15 May 2011 21:30:32 +0300, Piotr Szturmaj bncr...@jadamspam.pl
wrote:
What are the consequences of using non garbage collected threads in D?
If you move pointers around while the GC is looking for them, the GC might
miss them and free referenced memory. This will lead to memory
Trass3r Wrote:
Could it be a stack corruption?
That would make the most sense for the behavior I'm seeing, but I don't really
know how to corrupt the stack without using ASM, and even then I'd probably
fail.
Vladimir Panteleev Wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 02:18:22 +0300, Jesse Phillips
jessekphillip...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip memory corruption rant]
I've nothing to contribute but by own anecdotal experience. So: are you
doing *any* allocations or throwing exceptions in finalizers
16 matches
Mail list logo
