On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 11:38:38 UTC, Mafi wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 05:24:05 UTC, John Colvin
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 03:39:02 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
...
```
immutable int x = 10;
int* px = cast(int*)
*px = 9;
writeln(x);
```
It prints 10,
I am just starting to look into D and i have to say I am loving
it at the moment. But I have ran into an issue that i can't seem
to find any libraries for Api hooking.
If anyone knows of a well documented source for this it would be
much appreciated.
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 05:24:05 UTC, John Colvin
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 03:39:02 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
...
```
immutable int x = 10;
int* px = cast(int*)
*px = 9;
writeln(x);
```
It prints 10, where I expected 9. This is on Windows. I'm
curious if anyone
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 14:34:07 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
I was not aware that you could "violate" immutable. In that
case, it's not immutable.
You can violate absolutely everything in a system language with
casts and pointers. That is exactly what makes it system
language. But you
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 14:34:07 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 05:24:05 UTC, John Colvin
wrote:
violating immutable is undefined behaviour, so the compiler is
technically speaking free to assume it never happens. At the
very least, neither snippet's
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 17:09:40 UTC, Freddy wrote:
What does it mean when there is a scope in a function argument.
That you are not supposed to let that reference escape the
function scope. The compiler does little verification of this
right now, but may optimize on that
What does it mean when there is a scope in a function argument.
---
void func(scope int* a){}
---
On 09/23/2015 10:11 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 17:09:40 UTC, Freddy wrote:
>> What does it mean when there is a scope in a function argument.
>
> That you are not supposed to let that reference escape the function
> scope.
Just to complete with a related
On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 04:17:14 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Is libxlsxwriter available in the systems package manager?
Pacman says no.
Let e.g. Windows users figure theirs out.
libxlsxwriter is not supported on windows. Which is kind-of funny.
On 09/23/2015 06:01 AM, Aidan wrote:
I am just starting to look into D and i have to say I am loving it at
the moment. But I have ran into an issue that i can't seem to find any
libraries for Api hooking.
If anyone knows of a well documented source for this it would be much
appreciated.
I
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/hrzfcjrltftgzansd...@forum.dlang.org
https://github.com/Trass3r/hooksample
What I HAD TO do to get it to compile:
programResultsQ = heapify!(compareResults,
Array!(Results!(O,I)))(Array!(Results!(O,I))([Results!(O,I)()]),
1);
programResultsQ.popFront();
What running it says:
AssertionFailure at line 381 of std.container.array.d, which
looks like:
/**
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 05:56:08 UTC, Enjoys Math
wrote:
What I HAD TO do to get it to compile:
programResultsQ = heapify!(compareResults,
Array!(Results!(O,I)))(Array!(Results!(O,I))([Results!(O,I)()]), 1);
programResultsQ.popFront();
What running it says:
AssertionFailure at
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
I wouldn't expect B's constructor to be called at all unless
"super" is used there.
"If no call to constructors via this or super appear in a
constructor, and
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
I wouldn't expect B's constructor to be called at all unless
"super" is used there.
"If no call to constructors via this or super appear in a
constructor, and the base class has a constructor, a call to
super() is inserted at the
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:04:44 UTC, Justin Whear
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:48:03 +, BBasile wrote:
I was thinking to a general *interleave()* algorithm for any
compatible Range of Range but I can't find any smart way to
process each sub range by front
Can you show a
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:17:27 +, BBasile wrote:
> On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:04:44 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:48:03 +, BBasile wrote:
>>
>>> I was thinking to a general *interleave()* algorithm for any
>>> compatible Range of Range but I can't find any
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:17:29 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:04:44 UTC, Justin Whear
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:48:03 +, BBasile wrote:
I was thinking to a general *interleave()* algorithm for any
compatible Range of Range but I can't find any
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:24:22 UTC, Justin Whear
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:17:27 +, BBasile wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:04:44 UTC, Justin Whear
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:48:03 +, BBasile wrote:
I was thinking to a general *interleave()* algorithm
On 09/23/2015 02:25 PM, tcak wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
I wouldn't expect B's constructor to be called at all unless "super"
is used there.
"If no call to constructors via this or
I was thinking to a general *interleave()* algorithm for any
compatible Range of Range but I can't find any smart way to
process each sub range by front, eg:
---
void interleave(RoR)(RoR r)
{
r.each!(a => a.writeln);
}
void main()
{
auto r = [[0,2],[1,3]];
interleave(r);
}
---
[code]
import std.stdio;
class B {
this() {
writeln("B.constructor");
foo();
}
void foo() {
writeln("B.foo");
}
}
class D : B {
this() {
writeln("D.constructor");
}
override
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:48:03 +, BBasile wrote:
> I was thinking to a general *interleave()* algorithm for any compatible
> Range of Range but I can't find any smart way to process each sub range
> by front
Can you show a sample input and output to clarify what you mean by
interleave? It's
On 24/09/15 2:43 PM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
I have just created bindings for libxlsxwriter, an c library for
creating excel files.
Used the htod tool to do most of the work, and only had to adjust some
things - mainly because libxlsxwriter uses data structures written in
macro's.
Right now I
I have just created bindings for libxlsxwriter, an c library for
creating excel files.
Used the htod tool to do most of the work, and only had to adjust
some things - mainly because libxlsxwriter uses data structures
written in macro's.
Right now I am making a dub package and I would like
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:30:37 UTC, BBasile wrote:
auto interleave(RoR)(RoR r)
{
return r.transposed.join;
If you use joiner it will even be lazy and avoid the allocation.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:25:04PM -0700, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On 09/23/2015 02:25 PM, tcak wrote:
> >On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> >>On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
> >>>I wouldn't expect B's
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:25:15 UTC, tcak wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:14:17 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 at 21:08:37 UTC, tcak wrote:
I wouldn't expect B's constructor to be called at all unless
"super" is used there.
"If no call to
28 matches
Mail list logo
