On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 04:12:45 UTC, stunaep wrote:
Thank you. This is just what I needed. I am curious though as
to why this doesn't work with strings. It would work if I
removed immutable from the Boxed constructor but I thought
strings were immutable. I get a compiler error 'not
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
it you think that you know the things better than somebody who
actually *lived* there in those times... well, keep thinking
that. also, don't forget to teach physics to physicians, medicine
to medics, and so on. i'm pretty sure that
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:47:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I'm writing some serialization code where I need to skip static
variables. So, I have a symbol from a struct, and I'd like to
test whether it's static or not. Ideally, I'd be able to do
something like
is(field == static)
but
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 11:31:26 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
For example in the 2000's Delphi was incredibly popular in
Russia because the holder at this time (so Borland unless it
was already Code Gear) sold literally **hundreds** of licenses
to the russian education department.
actually, no.
On 07/30/2016 05:47 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I'm writing some serialization code where I need to skip static
variables.
> So, I have a symbol from a struct, and I'd like to test whether it's
static
> or not.
static variables don't have the .offsetof property:
I'm writing some serialization code where I need to skip static variables.
So, I have a symbol from a struct, and I'd like to test whether it's static
or not. Ideally, I'd be able to do something like
is(field == static)
but of course that doesn't work. There is __traits(isStaticFunction, ...),
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
it you think that you know the things better than somebody who
actually *lived* there in those times... well, keep thinking
that. also, don't forget to teach physics to
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 13:54:13 UTC, pineapple wrote:
This failure seems curious and I haven't been able to
understand why it occurs, or whether it might be intentional.
For all other callable types, including functions and delegates
and types implementing opCall, the assertion passes.
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 13:04:56 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 07/30/2016 05:47 AM, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I'm writing some serialization code where I need to skip
static variables.
> So, I have a symbol from a struct, and I'd like to test
whether it's static
> or
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 11:46:11 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 11:31:26 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
For example in the 2000's Delphi was incredibly popular in
Russia because the holder at this time (so Borland unless it
was already Code Gear) sold literally **hundreds** of
On Saturday, July 30, 2016 06:04:56 Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 07/30/2016 05:47 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > I'm writing some serialization code where I need to skip static
>
> variables.
>
> > So, I have a symbol from a struct, and I'd like to
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 19:24:59 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/29/16 3:00 PM, Q. Schroll wrote:
Cases to consider: Arrays and AAs with const(T) Elements,
where T is a
value or a reference type respectively.
[snip]
Questions:
(1) Why do I have to specify the type here? Why does
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:30:55 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
it you think that you know the things better than somebody who
actually *lived* there in those times... well, keep
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 23:11:23 UTC, Seb wrote:
I would love to see the forum evolve into something
similar to reddit
I have a strong dislike of reddit (and thus rarely post there),
it is really hard to use and the voting system is petty.
The D ng isn't perfect, but it is basically
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 22:52:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:30:55 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
it you think that you know the things better than somebody
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 23:11:23 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 22:52:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:30:55 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
it
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 23:43:33 UTC, Seb wrote:
In any case I was trying to say that we could use reddit more
actively, we have our own subreddit
(https://www.reddit.com/r/d_language), but it's not used for
discussions. So maybe killing the bot & actively encouraging a
discussion to
I'm running into a problem where when I specify -cov in the DMD
compiler command, the coverage LST files are generated, but
they're all empty. Has anyone else run into this before? My
command line is:
dmd -m64 -gc -debug -w -wi -cov -X -Xf"obj\Unit.json" -I\
-deps="obj\Unit.dep" -c
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 22:52:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:30:55 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
it you think that you know the things better than somebody
I like to build structures using template mixins because one can
pick and choose functionality at compile time, but still have a
relationship between different types.
It would be really nice if one could sort of test if a template
mixin was "mixed" in(or ideally, struct S : SomeTemplate
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 23:33:27 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 23:11:23 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 22:52:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:30:55 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 22:58:31 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 22:52:23 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:30:55 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:24:55 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 12:18:08 UTC, LaTeigne wrote:
import std.stdio;
void myFunc(T)(in T val) {
static if(is(T == string)) {
writeln("string: ", val);
}
static if(is(T : long)) {
writeln("long: ", val);
}
static if // WHAT HERE ?
writeln("null");
}
}
int main(string[] args)
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 00:04:41 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I have a strong dislike of reddit (and thus rarely post there),
it is really hard to use and the voting system is petty.
But this would be our own subreddit. I don't disagree if you're
talking about r/programming.
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 05:22:40 UTC, AntonSotov wrote:
import std.stdio;
void myFunc(T)(in T val) {
static if(is(T == string)) {
writeln("string: ", val);
}
static if(is(T : long)) {
writeln("long: ", val);
}
static if // WHAT HERE
2 Seb
Thank you!
is (T: typeof (null)) - very comfortable
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 04:32:10 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
I wasn't directing my comment at you specifically. I was
talking about the direction the thread took,
what do you prefer: to have a completely false information, or
corrected information for the price of one or two troll-like
posts? i
On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 01:32:50 UTC, Karabuta wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 July 2016 at 15:11:00 UTC, llaine wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm using D since a few month now and I was wondering why
people don't jump onto it that much and why it isn't the "big
thing" already.
Everybody is into javascript
28 matches
Mail list logo
