On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 21:04:30 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Agreed. Surprisingly, there are quite a number of issues that
request exactly that, mostly thanks to our old friend
bearophile. The following may be the reason for this WAT:
This is another case where I can kinda get it in
On Monday, March 20, 2017 22:47:24 Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> The rules make sense alone, but together, they are just bizarre.
That's frequently where the language design pitfalls lie. Well-meaning
features that seem perfectly reasonable on their own (possibly even
On 2017-03-20 00:49, Ervin Bosenbacher wrote:
On Sunday, 19 March 2017 at 23:23:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 19 March 2017 at 22:33:26 UTC, Ervin Bosenbacher wrote:
Is it normal to see the long trace output instead of just a failed
unit test message?
Yeah, it is normal, though IMO
On 2017-03-19 22:32, Nordlöw wrote:
Is there an in-place version of std.uni.toLower()
If not, how do I most elegantly construct one?
I would recommend against toLower and toUpper as in-place versions. Not
all letters can be converted in-place, i.e. they might require more storage.
--
On Monday, March 20, 2017 07:51:09 Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I have a Meson build for a D program project with a single main.d file
> that has some unit tests. Both executable and test executable are
> created and work as expected.
>
> I created a minimal Dub file for this
On 03/20/2017 09:31 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 16:04:10 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/eafa86c5426d
Unbelievable, we're both right, sort of.
So it is true that typeof(static[]) == dynamic.
But the language also allows implicit conversion in the other
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 07:36:47 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-03-20 00:49, Ervin Bosenbacher wrote:
On Sunday, 19 March 2017 at 23:23:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 19 March 2017 at 22:33:26 UTC, Ervin Bosenbacher
wrote:
Is it normal to see the long trace output instead of
I have a Meson build for a D program project with a single main.d file
that has some unit tests. Both executable and test executable are
created and work as expected.
I created a minimal Dub file for this project. Using Dub the program
runs as expected. However when I run "dub test" it claims to
On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 00:58 -0700, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
>
[…]
> I haven't spent the time to dig in and report it properly, but based
> on some
> of what I saw recently on a project I have, the module with main in
> it
> didn't have its tests run, as if dub's didn't
On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 08:39 +, Russel Winder wrote:
> […]
> Actually it seems worse than that. Even with "dub -b unittest" it
> appears that Dub compiles main.d without the -unittest flag to ldc2
> and so the normal application runs.
And different behaviour with different build options, at
On 2017-03-20 10:07, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
And different behaviour with different build options, at least when
using dmd, but I think the same is true for ldc2:
|> dub test
No source files found in configuration 'library'. Falling back to "dub -b
unittest".
Performing
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 15:46:10 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 15:38:26 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
This explicit slice won't work, because a slice of a fixed
size array results in a fixed size array.
No, it doesn't. int[4] a; typeof(a[] == int[])
You can try yourself in
On Monday, March 20, 2017 14:36:32 Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Given the following, where X and Y mark the spot:
>
> X epochRegex = regex("([0-9])+:");
> Y aEpochCapture = matchFirst(aVersionString, epochRegex);
> Y bEpochCapture = matchFirst(bVersionString, epochRegex);
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 16:04:10 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/eafa86c5426d
Unbelievable, we're both right, sort of.
So it is true that typeof(static[]) == dynamic.
But the language also allows implicit conversion in the other
direction WTF. If you put a variable in
A file stream would be another example of a thing that can't be
naturally const even if you opened it for reading.
Given the following, where X and Y mark the spot:
X epochRegex = regex("([0-9])+:");
Y aEpochCapture = matchFirst(aVersionString, epochRegex);
Y bEpochCapture = matchFirst(bVersionString, epochRegex);
If X or Y are const or immutable the code fails to compile. Only if
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 15:38:26 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
This explicit slice won't work, because a slice of a fixed size
array results in a fixed size array.
No, it doesn't. int[4] a; typeof(a[] == int[])
You can try yourself in the compiler, it is easy to verify.
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 04:03:20 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9279
Has it not been fixed?
That's specific to the return statement. Like you can assign an
address of a local variable, but you can't return it.
On Thursday, 16 March 2017 at 17:50:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
string s = func()[]; // I'd allow it, at least the user wrote
`[]` meaning they realized it was stack data and presumably
knows what that means about the slice's lifetime
This explicit slice won't work, because a slice of a
On Sunday, 19 March 2017 at 21:53:17 UTC, Seb wrote:
FWIW this has been fixed by Martin last summer, but the people
at GitHub aren't very responsive. The PR is still pending :/
More info:
https://trello.com/c/g9PB3ISG/233-improve-d-language-recognition-on-github
typeof() fails unless method is static. Says & requires
this.
But for typeof, it shouldn't matter and should pass.
So how to get a function pointer to a non static member
function(of an interface)?
I've tried creating the type like
T t;
typeof() fptr;
but same issue. It may be because T
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 17:58:32 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
2) Create a template that can be used like this (you'll want to
consult std.traits for this):
void foo (delegateOf!(T.method) fptr) {}
This may sound harder that it is, btw. A template that does
exactly that is the following
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 18:27:39 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Monday, 20 March 2017 at 17:58:32 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
[...]
This may sound harder that it is, btw. A template that does
exactly that is the following (template constraints that verify
`method` to actually be a
23 matches
Mail list logo
