On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 19:19:53 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 15:38:55 UTC, Vino.B wrote:
Thank you very much, I copied your folder arsd under the
phobes folder in c:\D\... and the program was placed on my
desktop and tried to execute it from the desktop via rdmd.
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 11:09:56 UTC, Vino wrote:
Now the program works, but the attachment does not work as
expected,
message.addAttachment("text/plain", "C:\\Temp\\Test\Test1.txt",
"Test");
What did you expect that "Test" argument to do if it was going to
read the file as the
On 11/04/2018 1:56 AM, Eduard Staniloiu wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 14:51:24 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 13:51:47 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Well, you know the type, because make returned it no? The contract
is, you call obj = make!X(args), then you have to
Should ranges always provide a length property?
If so, in which cases is a length property an advantage or a
requirement?
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 13:51:02 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 11:09:56 UTC, Vino wrote:
Now the program works, but the attachment does not work as
expected,
message.addAttachment("text/plain",
"C:\\Temp\\Test\Test1.txt", "Test");
What did you expect that
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 14:25:52 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Should ranges always provide a length property?
No.
If so, in which cases is a length property an advantage or a
requirement?
Just provide it whenever it is cheap to do so. If you need to do
complex calculations or especially loop
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 15:10:44 UTC, Vino wrote:
The variable "to" is of type string[] but we need it as
Array!string
The variable "Subject" but we need it as Array!string.
You'll have to convert them yourself if that is a must, but why
would you need that?
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 03:48:25 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
Nope! It's just a tagged union, almost exactly the same as what
you'd write by hand in C. You can take a look at the source
yourself, if you're curious---it's actually pretty simple:
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 14:51:24 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 13:51:47 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Well, you know the type, because make returned it no? The
contract is, you call obj = make!X(args), then you have to
call dispose(obj), where obj is of the type X.
On 4/10/18 12:59 PM, Paul Backus wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 12:34:07 UTC, aliak wrote:
Awesome!
this is a neat trick:
union
{
AliasSeq!(T0, T1) values;
}
Is that usage documented somewhere, or is it somewhere in phobos maybe?
Also, can Algebraic be fully replaced with this
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 14:25:52 Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Should ranges always provide a length property?
>
> If so, in which cases is a length property an advantage or a
> requirement?
Whether a range has a length property or not is primarily dependent on how
efficient it is
On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 16:51:14 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On 04/08/2018 06:15 PM, popgen wrote:
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
Should it be `q <= k` here? You're using q as an index into an
array of length k + 1. If you go up to i, you'll exceed that
and go out of bounds.
That you're
I'm trying to update the language spec. I have the standard dmd
installed on my Mac in `~/dlang/dmd` using the install script
from the website "curl -fsS https://dlang.org/install.sh | bash
-s dmd". Okay, good, done.
Now, according to: dlang.org/CONTRIBUTING.md:
"git clone
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 12:34:07 UTC, aliak wrote:
Awesome!
this is a neat trick:
union
{
AliasSeq!(T0, T1) values;
}
Is that usage documented somewhere, or is it somewhere in
phobos maybe?
Also, can Algebraic be fully replaced with this version then or
is there some functionality
On 4/10/18 3:24 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 18:52:19 kinke via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 18:34:54 UTC, n0fun wrote:
Why the destructor is called in the second case and why not in
the first?
The first case is RAII, where destruction
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 14:34:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 14:25:52 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Should ranges always provide a length property?
No.
If so, in which cases is a length property an advantage or a
requirement?
Just provide it whenever it is cheap to
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 18:34:54 UTC, n0fun wrote:
Why the destructor is called in the second case and why not in
the first?
The first case is RAII, where destruction isn't done for not
fully constructed instances.
The second case is GC finalization at program shutdown and looks
like a
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 18:52:19 kinke via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 18:34:54 UTC, n0fun wrote:
> > Why the destructor is called in the second case and why not in
> > the first?
>
> The first case is RAII, where destruction isn't done for not
> fully constructed
import std.stdio;
struct S(alias n) {
this(int) {
throw new Exception("Exception");
}
~this() {
writeln("destructor " ~ n);
}
}
void main() {
writeln("--- 1 ---");
try {
auto s = S!"1"(0);
} catch (Exception) {}
writeln("--- 2 ---");
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 20:08:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 19:47:10 Nordlöw via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 14:34:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 14:25:52 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
>> Should ranges always
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 21:52:22 Michael Coulombe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I had a bug in my code that was messing me up for a while, and it
> boiled down to an identity check between two Object references
> with unrelated static types, like below:
>
> class A {}
> class B {}
> void
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:07:40PM +, Cym13 via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> On the other hand I don't think the end user should have to scratch
> his head to find the length of a range, especially if it's not trivial
> to get (say, O(log n) kind of case). Therefore exposing a method in
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 22:07:40 Cym13 via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 20:08:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 19:47:10 Nordlöw via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 14:34:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On 4/10/18 4:08 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 19:47:10 Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I'm thinking of my own container Hashmap having its range
ByKeyValue requiring one extra word of memory to store the
iteration count which, in turn, can be used to calculate
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 20:16:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
e.g. std.array.array is going to pre-allocate an array of the
correct length and fill it in, vs. appending each element as it
gets them from the range.
Personally, I would store the length because typically a
container
I had a bug in my code that was messing me up for a while, and it
boiled down to an identity check between two Object references
with unrelated static types, like below:
class A {}
class B {}
void main() {
A a = new A;
B b = new B;
if (a is b) {} // compiles
}
I was surprised that
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 19:47:10 Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 14:34:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 14:25:52 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
> >> Should ranges always provide a length property?
> >
> > No.
> >
> >> If so, in which cases
On 4/10/18 6:07 PM, Cym13 wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 20:08:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 19:47:10 Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 14:34:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 14:25:52 UTC, Nordlöw
On 4/10/18 5:52 PM, Michael Coulombe wrote:
I had a bug in my code that was messing me up for a while, and it boiled
down to an identity check between two Object references with unrelated
static types, like below:
class A {}
class B {}
void main() {
A a = new A;
B b = new B;
if
On 4/9/18 6:56 PM, Jonathan wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 22:53:31 UTC, Jonathan wrote:
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 22:49:07 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
I don't know, but I can't reproduce either with dmd or ldc. What was
your compilation line?
dmd -run file.d
I am on Window 10 btw.
It's a
On Monday, 9 April 2018 at 19:17:20 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
[...]
I had a chance to try this out and it worked without a problem. I
did have to download color.d in addition to the other
dependencies you listed. In the event that Google brings someone
here, this is a complete working
31 matches
Mail list logo