On Sunday, May 27, 2018 16:28:56 Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-05-27 at 13:10 +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
>
> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 13:02:23 UTC, loloof64 wrote:
> > > What's the purpose of this 'in' keyword ? I could not process a
> >
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 13:04:54 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 28/05/2018 1:02 AM, loloof64 wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've just completed the language tour, and I am starting a
tutorial in order to use Gtk binding.
But somewhere, they use the 'in' keyword for the constructor :
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 06:47:38 UTC, IntegratedDimensions
wrote:
A string mixin is too messy since it treats the code as a
string losing all syntax highlighting, etc.
I'd love to have something like a template mixin where I can
just do
mixin template fooSetup(ret)
{
// setup stuff
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 06:47:38 UTC, IntegratedDimensions
wrote:
Putting the code in a template/function/lambda does not work
because of the scopes which will be called when the main
function exists.
I think you might just be using the wrong kind of function.
---
import std.stdio;
// the
I'd like to get symbols that have an UDA.
But when the member is private, it is not obtained.
And I found a comment saying "Filtering inaccessible members" in
the source.
Why is it necessary to filter out private members?
The integer type in gmp-z just got export (binary serialization)
support at
https://github.com/nordlow/gmp-d/pull/8
Next up is import (binary deserialization).
What's the preferred D-style naming convention for wrapping
exporting and exporting to binary formats?
I'm thinking
I guess I should have mentioned that basically this is like a C
macro.
I have some code like
void foo()
{
// setup stuff
int x;
scope(exit) something;
//
x = 34;
}
void foon()
{
// setup stuff
int x;
scope(exit) something;
//
}
All the setup stuff is virtually identical in each foo. There are
slight differences such
On Saturday, 26 May 2018 at 18:10:30 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Saturday, 26 May 2018 at 15:00:40 UTC, Malte wrote:
This compiles with DMD, however it returns random numbers
instead of the value I passed in. Looks like a bug to me.
Should that work or is there any other pattern I could use
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 09:23:09 UTC, IntegratedDimensions
wrote:
C[] c;
@property C[] get() { return c; }
get ~= something;
errors out, yet
auto q = get;
q ~= something;
is fine.
Why is D thinking that ~= is being applied to get, the
function, rather than what it returns?
Also
When
C[] c;
@property C[] get() { return c; }
get ~= something;
errors out, yet
auto q = get;
q ~= something;
is fine.
Why is D thinking that ~= is being applied to get, the function,
rather than what it returns?
Also
When I converted a field in to a property, an AA, it is returning
null
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 09:28:36 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 09:23:09 UTC, IntegratedDimensions
wrote:
C[] c;
@property C[] get() { return c; }
get ~= something;
errors out, yet
auto q = get;
q ~= something;
is fine.
Why is D thinking that ~= is being applied to
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 17:42:15 UTC, Sobaya wrote:
I'd like to get symbols that have an UDA.
But when the member is private, it is not obtained.
And I found a comment saying "Filtering inaccessible members"
in the source.
Why is it necessary to filter out private members?
Since the
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 23:21:05 UTC, IntegratedDimensions
wrote:
I came across a few posts mentioning this after the fact. It's
been this way since at least 2012 so... It's now may so not
sure how much longer we'll have to wait. That pull seems to
have stalled. So close but so far away ;/
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 13:20:08 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 06:47:38 UTC, IntegratedDimensions
wrote:
Putting the code in a template/function/lambda does not work
because of the scopes which will be called when the main
function exists.
I think you might just be
I'm trying to use wkhtmltopdf[1] with D. I converted this
header[2] with little modification using htod tool which resulted
in this[3].
The libray is passed to link using:
pragma(lib, "wkhtmltox.lib");
(that file is in wkhtmltopdf\lib folder)
and the module imported with:
import pdf;
but it
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 01:28:10 UTC, Dr.No wrote:
What's likely the reason of the crash? mismatch between D and C
memory alignment?
From an ABI point of view, the raw pointers won't care about the
memory structure they point to. The function call is the only
thing that depends on the
On Monday, 28 May 2018 at 01:28:10 UTC, Dr.No wrote:
I'm trying to use wkhtmltopdf[1] with D. I converted this
header[2] with little modification using htod tool which
resulted in this[3].
The libray is passed to link using:
pragma(lib, "wkhtmltox.lib");
(that file is in wkhtmltopdf\lib
On Sunday, May 27, 2018 21:54:42 Per Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> The integer type in gmp-z just got export (binary serialization)
> support at
>
> https://github.com/nordlow/gmp-d/pull/8
>
> Next up is import (binary deserialization).
>
> What's the preferred D-style naming convention
On 28/05/2018 1:02 AM, loloof64 wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've just completed the language tour, and I am starting a tutorial in
order to use Gtk binding.
But somewhere, they use the 'in' keyword for the constructor :
(https://sites.google.com/site/gtkdtutorial/#chapter2 : in section 3 for
On 5/25/18 4:02 PM, IntegratedDimensions wrote:
So, I upgraded everything, tried to add the setter and get an compile
time access violation:
override @property T t(T v) { _t = v; return v; }
Changing T v to TT v gives the violation
override @property T t(TT v) { _t = v; return v; }
Hello everyone,
I've just completed the language tour, and I am starting a
tutorial in order to use Gtk binding.
But somewhere, they use the 'in' keyword for the constructor :
(https://sites.google.com/site/gtkdtutorial/#chapter2 : in
section 3 for Buttons and Callbacks, main.d snippet).
On Sun, 2018-05-27 at 13:10 +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 13:02:23 UTC, loloof64 wrote:
> > What's the purpose of this 'in' keyword ? I could not process a
> > good Google request to get an answer.
>
> It means you are taking the parameter in to
On Sunday, 27 May 2018 at 13:02:23 UTC, loloof64 wrote:
What's the purpose of this 'in' keyword ? I could not process a
good Google request to get an answer.
It means you are taking the parameter in to look at, but not
modify or store.
Basically "const". (well, for now, literally "const"
On Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 18:51:31 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I'm trying to find a way to declare a block of code `nothrow:`
when compiling with -betterC, but not `nothrow` when not
compiling with -betterC.
The solution is needed for this PR:
25 matches
Mail list logo
