On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 19:00:36 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 13:14:50 UTC, Ernesto
Castellotti wrote:
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 04:41:31 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Is this a bug with LDC and DMD, or is it not allowed
to dynamically call a SO from a statically
I need to be sure about "const ref". Based on the following
function, does it mean:
Type can be string or an integral type.
(a) k1 is not copied on function calls
(b) k1 cannot be modified inside function
Please correct me if I am wrong. Can storage class "in" be used
to satisfy (a) and (b)?
On Sunday, 9 February 2020 at 14:08:02 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
"lflags-windows": ["/SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS",
"/ENTRY:mainCRTStartup"],
[snip]
Is there a way to avoid the console Window, at least for
release builds?
Thank you! Your solution I guess is for dub.json.
For those using dub.sdl the
On Sunday, 9 February 2020 at 14:08:02 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
"lflags-windows": ["/SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS",
"/ENTRY:mainCRTStartup"],
[snip]
Is there a way to avoid the console Window, at least for
release builds?
Thank you! Your solution I guess is for dub.json.
For those using dub.sdl the
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 04:41:31 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Is this a bug with LDC and DMD, or is it not allowed
to dynamically call a SO from a statically build executable on
linux
On Unix systems it is not possible to dynamically load a library
shared by a static executable, I don't
On Friday, 31 January 2020 at 14:25:30 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Friday, 31 January 2020 at 11:19:37 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
I see that DUB has DMD as a library package, but I was not
able to understand how to use it.
Is it possible to use DMD as a library within a D program to
compile a
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 12:31:03 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Friday, 31 January 2020 at 14:25:30 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
[...]
about [1] (llvm) I've made a better binding this weekend:
https://gitlab.com/basile.b/llvmd-d
Seriouly I cant believe that at some point in the past I
translated
class IntValue
{
int x = 5;
}
class Foo
{
IntValue val = new IntValue();
}
void main()
{
Foo f1 = new Foo();
Foo f2 = new Foo();
assert(f1.val == f2.val);
}
Is this expected? Or should each Foo have their own IntValue
object? They're equal right now, changing one changes
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 18:18:16 UTC, JN wrote:
Is this expected?
Yes, it is per the spec, though new users find it weird. Maybe we
should change this but any static initializer is run at CTFE.
Then the *static pointer* is put into the static initializer,
which is just copied over
On 2/10/20 1:18 PM, JN wrote:
class IntValue
{
int x = 5;
}
class Foo
{
IntValue val = new IntValue();
}
void main()
{
Foo f1 = new Foo();
Foo f2 = new Foo();
assert(f1.val == f2.val);
}
Is this expected?
Define "expected" ;)
It's been this way for a while
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 13:14:50 UTC, Ernesto Castellotti
wrote:
On Monday, 10 February 2020 at 04:41:31 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Is this a bug with LDC and DMD, or is it not allowed
to dynamically call a SO from a statically build executable on
linux
On Unix systems it is not possible
11 matches
Mail list logo
