On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 13:23:38 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Use a union.
Nice! Thanks!
I've written the beginning but dont know how to end.
What is the way to add functionality for the add,edit,delete
button ?
//==
import gtk.Button;
import gtk.Box;
import gtk.Label;
import gtk.Entry;
import gtk.Grid;
import gtk.Main;
import gtk.MainWindow;
import
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:50:47 UTC, NonNull wrote:
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that the
size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same, and I
have translated it into very similar D just like
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:56:33 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:50:47 UTC, NonNull wrote:
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that
the size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same, and
I have translated it into very similar D just
On 10/17/20 12:00 AM, Paul Backus wrote:
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 00:06:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Appender is ref counted IIRC.
It's not; it uses the GC.
Oh yeah. In fact, it was me who did that (in 2010!).
My point should have been that the appender is a pImpl to avoid
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 12:35:37 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Friday, 16 October 2020 at 21:26:12 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
To further explain this -- the padding is added so things like
pointer arithmetic on an array work.
In my code sample above one can only access the first
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 13:00:59 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
I understand that. I don't want the alignment of `S` to change.
I want the padding after `s`
That padding is part of S. It is at the end, after its fields,
but still part of it.
S's layout doesn't depend on what else is around
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 13:42:46 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I think it *should* be possible to do this, if it's not
already, just with pragmas. (i.e. pack T but not S).
Agree, a pragma, say `pragma(pack)`, to control this would be
great to avoid the unsafe union hack.
On Friday, 16 October 2020 at 21:28:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Inner functions have benefits:
1. They are only accessible inside the function. Which means
you only have to worry about correctness while INSIDE that
function.
2. inner functions have access to the outer function's stack
On 10/17/20 8:28 AM, NonNull wrote:
On Friday, 16 October 2020 at 21:28:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Inner functions have benefits:
1. They are only accessible inside the function. Which means you only
have to worry about correctness while INSIDE that function.
2. inner functions have
On Sunday, 11 October 2020 at 18:51:17 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
Tk default keys are somewhat different from what we used to use
for selecting, copying and pasting the text. So, any Tk based
GUI app starts with writing the rebinding function for
"ctrl+a", "ctrl+c", "ctrl+x" and "ctrl+v" keys,
On Friday, 16 October 2020 at 16:00:07 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/16/20 9:12 AM, tchaloupka wrote:
So when the exception is thrown within Foo destructor (and
it's bad on it's own but can easily happen as destructors
aren't nothrow @nogc by default).
Is this behavior expected?
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 12:44:44 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Can `align`s be inserted in S or/and T so that T is packed to 8
bytes but still aligned to 8 bytes?
Yes. Put an align on the OUTSIDE of the struct you are nesting,
then put one INSIDE the struct you want the contents packed.
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 12:51:21 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
c does come directly after s. The padding between b and c is
part of s. If you don't want that padding, you can use
`align(1)` to define S without padding. But then 75% of the
ints in an S[] will be misaligned.
I understand that.
On Tuesday, 13 October 2020 at 17:02:54 UTC, Jack wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 October 2020 at 08:07:17 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Friday, 9 October 2020 at 21:07:28 UTC, jack wrote:
[...]
https://www.github.com/vibe-d/vibe.d/tree/master/examples%2Fweb-i18n
There's also an example here
My dub.json
On 10/17/20 9:00 AM, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 12:51:21 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
c does come directly after s. The padding between b and c is part of
s. If you don't want that padding, you can use `align(1)` to define S
without padding. But then 75% of the ints in an S[]
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 15:03:29 UTC, Dennis wrote:
If you want to exactly match the original C code's semantics, I
suggest translating (unsigned) long with c_long or c_ulong. You
can import them here:
```
import core.stdc.config: c_long, c_ulong;
```
Then you could add this:
```
On Friday, 16 October 2020 at 21:26:12 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
To further explain this -- the padding is added so things like
pointer arithmetic on an array work.
In my code sample above one can only access the first element
anyhow so I don't understand why this restriction is
On 17.10.20 14:35, Per Nordlöw wrote:
struct S
{
int i;
bool b;
}
struct T
{
S s; // reinterpreting this as an array can only access this first
element anyway
char c; // so why can't this be aligned directly after `s` without
any padding?
}
c does come directly after
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 12:44:44 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Can `align`s be inserted in S or/and T so that T is packed to 8
bytes but still aligned to 8 bytes? I don't see why this
shouldn't be the default behaviour...
I though this would do the trick but not...
struct S
{
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that the
size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same, and I have
translated it into very similar D just like
https://dlang.org/blog/2018/06/11/dasbetterc-converting-make-c-to-d/
D has the size of long fixed at 64 bits, so a
On Wednesday, 14 October 2020 at 15:11:29 UTC, Alaindevos wrote:
Is there an example just more functional then skeleton http
server ?
Sending data to the server and back .
If you're having vibe.d trouble and can't get a quick response,
jump in the discord. We're there to help?
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:50:47 UTC, NonNull wrote:
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that the
size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same
static assert(long.sizeof == void*.sizeof);
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:50:47 UTC, NonNull wrote:
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that the
size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same, and I
have translated it into very similar D just like
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:56:35 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:50:47 UTC, NonNull wrote:
I have inherited an open source C project that assumes that
the size of a long and the size of a pointer are the same
static assert(long.sizeof == void*.sizeof);
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:53:35 UTC, Alaindevos wrote:
I've written the beginning but dont know how to end.
What is the way to add functionality for the add,edit,delete
button ?
//==
import gtk.Button;
import gtk.Box;
import gtk.Label;
import gtk.Entry;
I could not even find demo code doing a redirect which is the
most basic stuff. https://mcdvoicesurvey.onl
https://mybk-experience.onl
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 09:33:04 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
On Sunday, 11 October 2020 at 18:51:17 UTC, tastyminerals wrote:
Tk default keys are somewhat different from what we used to
use for selecting, copying and pasting the text. So, any Tk
based GUI app starts with writing the
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 16:35:29 UTC, shamsmehra90 wrote:
I could not even find demo code doing a redirect which is the
most basic stuff. https://mcdvoicesurvey.onl
https://mybk-experience.onl
There are 6 examples doing a redirect:
https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe.d/search?q=redirect=
On Saturday, 17 October 2020 at 14:53:35 UTC, Alaindevos wrote:
I've written the beginning but dont know how to end.
What is the way to add functionality for the add,edit,delete
button ?
//==
I put an example[1] here. The fields are not editable. You will
30 matches
Mail list logo
