Hi,
In my framework I just found a dozen of compile time error
handling like:
...else static assert("Invalid type");
This compiles without error. And it was useless for detecting
errors because I forgot the first "false" or "0" parameter.
I think it is because of the weird case of "every
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 09:11:41 UTC, JG wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 08:51:45 UTC, realhet wrote:
Hi,
In my framework I just found a dozen of compile time error
handling like:
...else static assert("Invalid type");
This compiles without error. And it was useless for detecting
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 08:51:45 UTC, realhet wrote:
Hi,
In my framework I just found a dozen of compile time error
handling like:
...else static assert("Invalid type");
This compiles without error. And it was useless for detecting
errors because I forgot the first "false" or "0"
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 08:51:45 UTC, realhet wrote:
Hi,
In my framework I just found a dozen of compile time error
handling like:
...else static assert("Invalid type");
This compiles without error. And it was useless for detecting
errors because I forgot the first "false" or "0"
On Monday, 30 May 2022 at 11:18:42 UTC, Alexander Zhirov wrote:
if (here is my condition termination of the program)
OT: Wouldn't it be great to have ArnoldC support? ;-)
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 09:35:30 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 08:51:45 UTC, realhet wrote:
Check if that string is init.
assert("", "cool");
assert("ehh", "cool");
assert(string.init, "Not cool");
I feel some "JavaScript equality operator" vibes in this :D
Anyways,
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 08:51:45 UTC, realhet wrote:
Hi,
In my framework I just found a dozen of compile time error
handling like:
...else static assert("Invalid type");
This compiles without error. And it was useless for detecting
errors because I forgot the first "false" or "0"
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 08:51:45 UTC, realhet wrote:
Hi,
In my framework I just found a dozen of compile time error
handling like:
...else static assert("Invalid type");
This compiles without error. And it was useless for detecting
errors because I forgot the first "false" or "0"
On 2022-05-30 15:25, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 5/30/22 04:18, Alexander Zhirov wrote:
> I want to run a command in the background
The closest is spawnShell:
import std.stdio;
import std.process;
import core.thread;
void main() {
auto pid = spawnShell(`(sleep 1 & echo SLEEP >> log)`);
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 09:52:10 UTC, realhet wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 09:35:30 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 08:51:45 UTC, realhet wrote:
Check if that string is init.
assert("", "cool");
assert("ehh", "cool");
assert(string.init, "Not cool");
I feel some
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 15:29:16 UTC, frame wrote:
On Monday, 30 May 2022 at 11:18:42 UTC, Alexander Zhirov wrote:
if (here is my condition termination of the program)
OT: Wouldn't it be great to have ArnoldC support? ;-)
i'm pretty sure the terminattor is more efficient than kill
I have tightly coupled code which I'd like to decouple but I'm a
bit stuck.
For simplicity, I reduced the amount of code to something simple
to understand. So I have a struct `S` that has templated member
function that does something. On the other side I have delegate
holder `R` - this
On 2022-05-29 23:08, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 5/29/22 13:47, Christian Köstlin wrote:
> Our discussion with using TLS for the
> collectors proposed to not need any lock on the add method for
> collector, because its thread local and with that thread safe?
It would be great that way but then
On 2022-05-29 23:00, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 5/29/22 13:53, Christian Köstlin wrote:
> According to
>
https://www.schveiguy.com/blog/2022/05/comparing-exceptions-and-errors-in-d/
> its bad to catch Errors ...
Correct in the sense that the program should not continue after catching
Error.
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 21:15:24 UTC, Andrey Zherikov wrote:
I have tightly coupled code which I'd like to decouple but I'm
a bit stuck.
For simplicity, I reduced the amount of code to something
simple to understand. So I have a struct `S` that has templated
member function that does
On 2022-05-31 23:15, Andrey Zherikov wrote:
I have tightly coupled code which I'd like to decouple but I'm a bit stuck.
For simplicity, I reduced the amount of code to something simple to
understand. So I have a struct `S` that has templated member function
that does something. On the other
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 21:53:17 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
If you want compile-time polymorphism, three's no other way.
Yes, I want compile-time polymorphism.
```d
import std.stdio;
struct S
{
// function that should be called from delegate
void doSomething(T)(T value) {
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 22:34:41 UTC, Christian Köstlin wrote:
Would it help to not create the delegate in R's constructor,
but feed
the delegate into it (and create the delegate outside). This
would also resemble your description (R is a delegate holder)
more.
That's possible but the
I'm creating an application in D to do some purchase management
stuff and I ran into a snag pretty early on. I'm trying to use
sqlite via [this
library](https://github.com/adamdruppe/arsd/blob/master/sqlite.d).
I started trying to get it to compile in another directory
structure but since I've
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 23:15:24 UTC, Andrey Zherikov wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 21:53:17 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
If you want compile-time polymorphism, three's no other way.
Yes, I want compile-time polymorphism.
In case if `S.doSomething` is NOT template function then the
20 matches
Mail list logo
