On Tuesday, 15 November 2022 at 14:05:42 UTC, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 November 2022 at 13:16:18 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
D's safety model is the same. In `@safe` code, D will reject
anything that the compiler cannot say for sure is memory safe.
However, unlike in Rust, `@safe`
Dear community,
I look some day ago to the D wasm page:
-> https://wiki.dlang.org/Generating_WebAssembly_with_LDC
And since then I ask myself can we at compile time convert a D
code to an extern C code for wasm ?
Indeed, if a library/framework would wrap this to let end user
write his
On Wednesday, 16 November 2022 at 23:00:40 UTC, Adam D Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 November 2022 at 22:51:31 UTC, bioinfornatics
wrote:
[...]
It would be pretty cool if you could just mark `@wasm` on a
function and have it magically convert... the dcompute thing i
*think* does something
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:51:31PM +, bioinfornatics via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I look some day ago to the D wasm page:
> -> https://wiki.dlang.org/Generating_WebAssembly_with_LDC
>
> And since then I ask myself can we at compile time convert a D code
> to an
On Wednesday, 16 November 2022 at 23:16:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
You mean with Phobos and everything included? I think there
may be issues with that...
Yes, this is a problem, but I think I have a solution: defer GC
runs until javascript is running. There's also some llvm features
that
On Wednesday, 16 November 2022 at 22:51:31 UTC, bioinfornatics
wrote:
And since then I ask myself can we at compile time convert a D
code to an extern C code for wasm ?
It would be pretty cool if you could just mark `@wasm` on a
function and have it magically convert... the dcompute thing i
Thanks Adam, H. S., max for your point of view
On Wednesday, 16 November 2022 at 23:23:48 UTC, Adam D Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 November 2022 at 23:16:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh
wrote:
You mean with Phobos and everything included? I think there
may be issues with that...
Yes that would be
I have SubclassOf derived from PosetRelation. For any poset
relation, the transitivity law applies, however, I'd like to
return the correct type:
```
PosetRelation transitivity(PosetRelation R, PosetRelation S)
{
if (R.op == S.op)
{
if (R.right is S.left)
```
PosetRelation transitivity(PosetRelation R, PosetRelation S)
{
// These if conditions are typically ordered from easiest to
// most involved-to-check.
if (R.op == S.op &&
is(typeof(R) == typeof(S)) &&
R.right == S.left)
{
return new typeof(R)(
R.left,
I am creating a TUI library and I have a class with the following
constant fields:
```
class Label : Renderable {
const string text;
const TextAlignment textAlignment;
const Color color;
this(Dimensions dimensions, string text, TextAlignment
textAlignment, Color color) {
On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 04:25:13 UTC, Daniel Donnelly,
Jr. wrote:
I have SubclassOf derived from PosetRelation. For any poset
relation, the transitivity law applies, however, I'd like to
return the correct type:
How does one accomplish this in D? Because PosetRelation
doesn't
On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 04:25:13 UTC, Daniel Donnelly,
Jr. wrote:
...
`crtp`, will it work?
I wouldn't bother.
They are const, they can't change.
Nothing to protect, nothing to synchronize.
On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 05:21:05 UTC, MorteFeuille123
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 04:25:13 UTC, Daniel Donnelly,
Jr. wrote:
[...]
You can use TypeInfoClass:
[...]
I don't get it - you never made use of b1 or b2...
On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 05:34:49 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 04:25:13 UTC, Daniel Donnelly,
Jr. wrote:
...
`crtp`, will it work?
Can't use CRTP, because once you choose a derived class to pass
into the template system, how do you pass in subclasses of that
On 11/16/22 20:39, thebluepandabear wrote:
> I am debating whether or not I should add getter methods to these
> properties.
If you are debating, then the answer is easy: you should not. :)
Less code written means less bugs, more cohesion, easier refactoring,
cleaner code, all good stuff...
16 matches
Mail list logo
