On Saturday, 30 July 2016 at 04:12:45 UTC, stunaep wrote:
Thank you. This is just what I needed. I am curious though as
to why this doesn't work with strings. It would work if I
removed immutable from the Boxed constructor but I thought
strings were immutable. I get a compiler error 'not
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 20:25:16 UTC, Cauterite wrote:
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 20:13:34 UTC, stunaep wrote:
I have some java code I need to convert and at one point it
uses an Object[] array to store various ints, longs, and
strings. Java has built in Integer and Long classes that wrap
On 07/29/2016 01:40 PM, Cauterite wrote:
> On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 20:26:47 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>>
>> I was going to suggest Algebraic because it allows arrays of mixed
>> primitive types (wrapped in Algebraic):
>>
>> https://dlang.org/phobos/std_variant.html#.Algebraic
>>
>> Ali
>
> It
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 20:26:47 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I was going to suggest Algebraic because it allows arrays of
mixed primitive types (wrapped in Algebraic):
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_variant.html#.Algebraic
Ali
It could work, but keep in mind Algebraic is a structure, not
On 07/29/2016 01:25 PM, Cauterite wrote:
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 20:13:34 UTC, stunaep wrote:
I have some java code I need to convert and at one point it uses an
Object[] array to store various ints, longs, and strings. Java has
built in Integer and Long classes that wrap the primitives in
On Friday, 29 July 2016 at 20:13:34 UTC, stunaep wrote:
I have some java code I need to convert and at one point it
uses an Object[] array to store various ints, longs, and
strings. Java has built in Integer and Long classes that wrap
the primitives in an object and strings are already
I have some java code I need to convert and at one point it uses
an Object[] array to store various ints, longs, and strings. Java
has built in Integer and Long classes that wrap the primitives in
an object and strings are already objects.
