Re: Broken TLS?
On 07/28/2016 12:38 AM, Dechcaudron wrote: Giving my 20 votes to the issue (are votes even taken into account?). At least now I know the source of attribute-enforcements breakdown is basically delegate management. That should help me out enough so I don't have this issue anymore. Thanks a bunch. Can I get your votes on that issue? As far as I know, no one cares much about votes. I'm not going to bother with them. This being a pretty serious accepts-invalid bug, it needs fixing regardless of votes. And unfortunately there are even more important/urgent bugs. There are 37 open dmd regressions [1], and 158 open wrong-code bugs [2]. Maybe not all of them are more important than the bug at hand, but a good bunch probably are. If voting did anything, I'd put everything into issues 15862 [3] and 16292 [4]. 15862 is a ridiculous wrong-code bug with pure nothrow functions. 16292 is a rejects-valid regression that is a blocking a toy project of mine (already has a pull request). [1] https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=regression=dmd_id=209764_format=advanced=--- [2] https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi?component=dmd=wrong-code_type=allwords_id=209765_format=advanced=--- [3] https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862 [4] https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16292
Re: Broken TLS?
On Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 20:54:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: Looks pretty bad. There's an open issue on this: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16095 Giving my 20 votes to the issue (are votes even taken into account?). At least now I know the source of attribute-enforcements breakdown is basically delegate management. That should help me out enough so I don't have this issue anymore. Thanks a bunch. Can I get your votes on that issue?
Re: Broken TLS?
On 07/27/2016 09:19 PM, Dechcaudron wrote:
struct Foo
{
[...]
void ping() shared
{
[...]
}
void fire()
{
spawn();
}
void explode() shared
{
ping();
}
}
void main()
{
auto a = Foo(1, 2);
a.fire();
thread_joinAll();
}
[...]
Is there anything I'm doing wrong? I won't lie, data sharing is the only
thing about D I don't find quite usable yet. Can anybody help me out on
this?
I think the program should not compile. You can't call a shared method
on an unshared struct/class, so you shouldn't be able to take make a
delegate of it and call that.
Reduced code:
struct Foo
{
void ping() shared {}
}
void main()
{
Foo a;
// a.ping(); // rejected
()(); // accepted
}
We can also break immutable/const with this:
struct Foo
{
int x = 0;
void ping() { x = 1; }
}
void main()
{
immutable Foo a;
// a.ping(); // rejected
()(); // accepted
assert(a.x == 0); // fails
}
Looks pretty bad. There's an open issue on this:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16095
