On 2015-07-23 03:57, Mike Parker wrote:
In your case, rd_kafka_metadata is the name of the struct, but in C
instances would need to be declared like so:
struct rd_kafka_metadata instance;
Since the struct is declared directly in the typedef, is the struct name
actually available?
--
On Thursday, 23 July 2015 at 06:26:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-07-23 03:57, Mike Parker wrote:
In your case, rd_kafka_metadata is the name of the struct, but
in C
instances would need to be declared like so:
struct rd_kafka_metadata instance;
Since the struct is declared directly
On Tuesday, 21 July 2015 at 05:53:26 UTC, yawniek wrote:
i tried to automagically create bindings for librdkafka
(https://github.com/edenhill/librdkafka)
with dstep.
now the code contains typedefs structs with the same name as
methods:
```
typedef struct rd_kafka_metadata {
int
On 2015-07-21 14:24, yawniek wrote:
done, https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep/issues/40
i was under the impression that there is already a ticked as
https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep/issues/8
looks very similar (but was closed).
Yeah, looks very similar. Issue 8 i still open and has
On 2015-07-21 07:53, yawniek wrote:
i tried to automagically create bindings for librdkafka
(https://github.com/edenhill/librdkafka)
with dstep.
now the code contains typedefs structs with the same name as methods:
```
typedef struct rd_kafka_metadata {
int broker_cnt; /*
On 21/07/2015 5:53 p.m., yawniek wrote:
i tried to automagically create bindings for librdkafka
(https://github.com/edenhill/librdkafka)
with dstep.
now the code contains typedefs structs with the same name as methods:
```
typedef struct rd_kafka_metadata {
int broker_cnt;
On Tuesday, 21 July 2015 at 06:12:53 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
what the correct way to bind these?
Please report an issue for this. In this case
rd_kafka_metadata_t should be used for the struct name.
done, https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/dstep/issues/40
i was under the impression that
