Re: DDoc Reference Links point to /docs/docs instead of /docs?
On Monday, 21 February 2022 at 16:58:43 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote: On Monday, 21 February 2022 at 15:35:41 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote: I'm a bit surprised I've never heard of `adrdox` before now. yeah i don't advertise much. it is what runs on my dpldocs.info website though which auto-generates docs for dub packages. Regarding ddoc, should I submit a bug report? If so, is ddoc considered part of the compiler? Yeah, it is part of dmd, so you can file on issues.dlang.org if you want. Bug reported here: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22803
Re: DDoc Reference Links point to /docs/docs instead of /docs?
On Monday, 21 February 2022 at 15:35:41 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote: I'm a bit surprised I've never heard of `adrdox` before now. yeah i don't advertise much. it is what runs on my dpldocs.info website though which auto-generates docs for dub packages. Regarding ddoc, should I submit a bug report? If so, is ddoc considered part of the compiler? Yeah, it is part of dmd, so you can file on issues.dlang.org if you want.
Re: DDoc Reference Links point to /docs/docs instead of /docs?
On Monday, 21 February 2022 at 13:18:01 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote: tbh ddoc is pretty bad, you should try my `dub run adrdox` instead which also creates html but its links actually work. I gave it a try and I must say that the documentation is formatted in a very good way, and as you said, all the links work. I'm a bit surprised I've never heard of `adrdox` before now. Thank you kindly for that! Regarding ddoc, should I submit a bug report? If so, is ddoc considered part of the compiler?
Re: DDoc Reference Links point to /docs/docs instead of /docs?
tbh ddoc is pretty bad, you should try my `dub run adrdox` instead which also creates html but its links actually work.
