Can anybody explain:
Is dependencies file produced from command:
dmd -deps=moduleA.deps moduleA.d
must contains mention of moduleC?
Is dependencies file produced reccursively?
Thanks.
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:36:49 UTC, Tobi G. wrote:
On Saturday, 9 January 2016 at 01:43:57 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
I get also a compilation error (with rdmd and -g).
Thanks Tobi and Ivan.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15533
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 15:45:52 UTC, zabruk70 wrote:
Should i create bugreport, or this is my mistake?
Same here:
rdmd moduleA.d works.
rdmd -g moduleA.d produces a linker error.
What's more:
rdmd -m64 -g moduleA.d fails, and
rdmd -m64 moduleA.d also fails.
I have dmd 2.069.2 here.
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 15:45:52 UTC, zabruk70 wrote:
Should i create bugreport, or this is my mistake?
I get also a compilation error (with rdmd and -g).
Fortunately building manually with dmd works.
So there has to be a bug in rdmd..
togrue
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 16:28:46 UTC, novice2 wrote:
I have 2 reduced files, wich i can't compile with new (DMD
2.066) rdmd.exe under Windows 7 32-bit.
Command: rdmd --force --build-only aaa.d
Message Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D3etc3bbb3fooFZi
But command: dmd aaa.d etc\bbb.d
Compile
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 16:28:46 UTC, novice2 wrote:
I have 2 reduced files, wich i can't compile with new (DMD
2.066) rdmd.exe under Windows 7 32-bit.
Command: rdmd --force --build-only aaa.d
Message Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D3etc3bbb3fooFZi
But command: dmd aaa.d etc\bbb.d
Compile
PR that introduced regression:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools/pull/108
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 16:28:46 UTC, novice2 wrote:
I have 2 reduced files, wich i can't compile with new (DMD
2.066) rdmd.exe under Windows 7 32-bit.
Command: rdmd --force --build-only aaa.d
Message Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D3etc3bbb3fooFZi
But command: dmd aaa.d etc\bbb.d
Compile
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:29:15 UTC, sigod wrote:
PR that introduced regression:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/tools/pull/108
Filed: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13366
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:32:15 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
No, it is not an rdmd bug.
etc is a standard D package name reserved for Phobos, the
standard library. It is the same for std and core.
Please, point us directly to a documentation where it says that
this words reserved.
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:37:39 UTC, sigod wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:32:15 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
No, it is not an rdmd bug.
etc is a standard D package name reserved for Phobos, the
standard library. It is the same for std and core.
Please, point us directly
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:37:39 UTC, sigod wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:32:15 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
No, it is not an rdmd bug.
etc is a standard D package name reserved for Phobos, the
standard library. It is the same for std and core.
Please, point us directly
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:32:15 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
etc is a standard D package name reserved for Phobos, the
Thanks for explanation.
I not be able to undertsand the cause - weird error message.
Now i can easy fix my code.
BTW, did rdmd determine user code or standard
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:41:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:37:39 UTC, sigod wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:32:15 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
No, it is not an rdmd bug.
etc is a standard D package name reserved for Phobos, the
standard library.
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 18:23:25 UTC, sigod wrote:
Actually, I never got to use this names for first package name.
(I only used `something.etc` and `something.core`.) So, I
didn't thought about this.
`something.etc` and `something.core` should work fine. Only
the three top-level
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 18:23:25 UTC, sigod wrote:
Isn't it better to document such things?
Yes. Please create a pull request.
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 18:12:44 UTC, novice2 wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:32:15 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
etc is a standard D package name reserved for Phobos, the
Thanks for explanation.
I not be able to undertsand the cause - weird error message.
Now i can easy fix
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:41:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:37:39 UTC, sigod wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:32:15 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
No, it is not an rdmd bug.
etc is a standard D package name reserved for Phobos, the
standard library.
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 18:41:58 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:41:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:37:39 UTC, sigod wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:32:15 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
No, it is not an rdmd bug.
etc is a
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 18:28:32 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 18:23:25 UTC, sigod wrote:
Isn't it better to document such things?
Yes. Please create a pull request.
Easy to say. In my TODO list lies record to create PR for [this
issue][0]. Today is
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 18:43:35 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 18:41:58 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:41:38 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:37:39 UTC, sigod wrote:
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 17:32:15
On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 18:55:08 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
But imported modules are the important case. If I have an
important bugfix in a module, and don't want to wait for the
next release, what am I supposed to do?
Rebuild Phobos. If rdmd were to compile your module, linking
would
22 matches
Mail list logo
