On Friday, 1 February 2019 at 08:12:23 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Friday, 1 February 2019 at 07:35:34 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
It's a strong typed handle, in C it's declared as
#ifdef STRICT
typedef void *HANDLE;
#if 0 && (_MSC_VER > 1000)
#define DECLARE_HANDLE(name) struct name##__; typedef struct
On Friday, 1 February 2019 at 07:35:34 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
It's a strong typed handle, in C it's declared as
#ifdef STRICT
typedef void *HANDLE;
#if 0 && (_MSC_VER > 1000)
#define DECLARE_HANDLE(name) struct name##__; typedef struct
name##__ *name
#else
#define DECLARE_HANDLE(name) struct
It's a strong typed handle, in C it's declared as
#ifdef STRICT
typedef void *HANDLE;
#if 0 && (_MSC_VER > 1000)
#define DECLARE_HANDLE(name) struct name##__; typedef struct
name##__ *name
#else
#define DECLARE_HANDLE(name) struct name##__{int unused;};
typedef struct name##__ *name
#endif
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 20:51:37 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
I noticed in druntime this template is used often:
package template DECLARE_HANDLE(string name, base = HANDLE) {
mixin ("alias " ~ base.stringof ~ " " ~ name ~ ";");
If my memory is correct, it is actually for old D
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 20:51:37 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
Hi,
I noticed in druntime this template is used often:
package template DECLARE_HANDLE(string name, base = HANDLE) {
mixin ("alias " ~ base.stringof ~ " " ~ name ~ ";");
The disadvantage is, IDEs like IntelliJ are not able to
On 1/31/19 3:51 PM, Andre Pany wrote:
Hi,
I noticed in druntime this template is used often:
package template DECLARE_HANDLE(string name, base = HANDLE) {
mixin ("alias " ~ base.stringof ~ " " ~ name ~ ";");
The disadvantage is, IDEs like IntelliJ are not able to find the symbols
using
