On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 20:36:09 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 14:20:57 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 08:39:24 UTC, Anton Fediushin
wrote:
Hello! I am currently trying to add a custom `toString`
method to an enum so that:
1. Enum members would still
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 14:20:57 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 08:39:24 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
Hello! I am currently trying to add a custom `toString` method
to an enum so that:
1. Enum members would still have numeric values and can be
easily compared (things like
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 14:11:05 UTC, diniz wrote:
Le 15/04/2019 à 10:39, Anton Fediushin via Digitalmars-d-learn
a écrit :
[snip]
I don't understand why you just don't call fun with an Enum
(struct) param, since that is how fun is defined. This works by
me (see call in main):
struct
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 08:39:24 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
Hello! I am currently trying to add a custom `toString` method
to an enum so that:
1. Enum members would still have numeric values and can be
easily compared (things like `enum a { foo = "FOO", bar =
"BAR”}` won't do, I want
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 08:39:24 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
Hello! I am currently trying to add a custom `toString` method
to an enum so that:
1. Enum members would still have numeric values and can be
easily compared (things like `enum a { foo = "FOO", bar =
"BAR”}` won't do, I want
Le 15/04/2019 à 10:39, Anton Fediushin via Digitalmars-d-learn a écrit :
This seems to work just fine for assigning and comparisons but passing Enum as a
function argument does not work:
```
void fun(Enum e) {}
fun(Enum.foo);
---
Error: function fun(Enum e) is not callable using argument types
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 13:38:33 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
This does work unless I want to use it like this:
```
fun(Enum.foo);
---
Error: function fun(Enum e) is not callable using argument
types (internal)
cannot pass argument foo of type internal to parameter Enum e
```
This is
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 12:25:38 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:34:42 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:06:30 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
[snip]
Isn't this how subtyping works for integers and other types?
For example, you have subtyped an integer
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:45:26 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:15:50 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:00:36 UTC, Alex wrote:
[snip]
This would:
´´´
struct Enum {
private {
enum internal {
foo,
bar
}
internal m_enum;
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 12:38:59 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
More generally you insist on modules and namespaces to be
different concepts, which they are (pointlessly) for C++, but
not for D (purposely).
Here I should say packages instead of modules... but the general
argument stays.
Anyway
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:34:42 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
The problem here is that I want to keep methods that are
related to an enum inside of this enum for purely aesthetic and
organizational purposes.
...
These global functions pollute global namespace.
If you have defined
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:34:42 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:06:30 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
You have defined your sub-typing the opposite way that you
wanted it to work: every `Enum` is an `internal`, but the
other way around an `internal` may not work as an
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:15:50 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:00:36 UTC, Alex wrote:
Enum.internal is private to make it inaccessible from any other
place. All I want is a way to have an enum that I could extend
with my own methods.
Something to make the
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:06:30 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 08:39:24 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
Hello! I am currently trying to add a custom `toString` method
Several remarks... First of all, strings can be compared
(alphabetically) as well as integers, e.g.
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 10:00:36 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 08:39:24 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
[snip]
Otherwise, you could alwas define fun as
´´´
void fun(Enum.internal e) {}
´´´
but I assume, you want to avoid especially this.
In favor of my first proposition,
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 08:39:24 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
Hello! I am currently trying to add a custom `toString` method
Several remarks... First of all, strings can be compared
(alphabetically) as well as integers, e.g.
assert("foo" > "bar")
Perhaps not your use case, but worth
On Monday, 15 April 2019 at 08:39:24 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
Hello! I am currently trying to add a custom `toString` method
to an enum so that:
1. Enum members would still have numeric values and can be
easily compared (things like `enum a { foo = "FOO", bar =
"BAR”}` won't do, I want
17 matches
Mail list logo
