On Monday, 11 November 2019 at 16:59:57 UTC, Q. Schroll wrote:
What's the difference of
is(C R == Complex!R)
to
is(C == Complex!R, R)
then?
Nothing, they do the same thing.
(I'm of the opinion that the first one should actually be illegal
- I thought it was until I checked for this
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 13:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 12:30:46 UTC, René Heldmaier
wrote:
The part i don't understand is "is(C R == Complex!R)".
What does that mean?
That's checking the if the template argument C is a case of
Complex!R, while at
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 13:26:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
That's checking the if the template argument C is a case of
Complex!R, while at the same time declaring a symbol R to hold
the inner type.
I got it. Thank you very much ;)
On Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 12:30:46 UTC, René Heldmaier
wrote:
The part i don't understand is "is(C R == Complex!R)".
What does that mean?
That's checking the if the template argument C is a case of
Complex!R, while at the same time declaring a symbol R to hold
the inner type.
So
