Re: Why rbtree.length isn't const?

[drug via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On 26.02.2015 18:44, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

Please submit an issue. http://issues.dlang.org

-Steve


Done: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14234

Re: Why rbtree.length isn't const?

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On 2/26/15 3:20 AM, drug wrote:

Is it intended by some reason?


No, it can be fixed. RBTree was not written to support const because D 
doesn't support tail-const ranges, which makes const really difficult to 
deal with. But length can definitely be const.


Please submit an issue. http://issues.dlang.org

-Steve