On Monday, 10 December 2018 at 16:15:36 UTC, aliak wrote:
Ah, that's a good way of breaking it down. But ok, so then the
other version would be lowered to:
template match(handlers...) {
template match(T) {
auto match(T holder) {
return handlers[0](holder);
}
On Saturday, 8 December 2018 at 14:21:01 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Saturday, 8 December 2018 at 09:57:29 UTC, aliak wrote:
This compiles fine. However, if I change the match template to:
template match(handlers...) {
auto match(alias f)(Holder!f holder) {
return handlers[0](holder)
On Saturday, 8 December 2018 at 09:57:29 UTC, aliak wrote:
This compiles fine. However, if I change the match template to:
template match(handlers...) {
auto match(alias f)(Holder!f holder) {
return handlers[0](holder);
}
}
Notice the template parameter of the eponymous match is
