On Tuesday, 27 August 2013 at 19:50:03 UTC, luminousone wrote:
I was under the impression that the atomic spinlock has a lower
latency for any waiters, then a mutex when its unlocked?
I am using this for a temporary or depending on performance, a
perminate replacement for std.concurrency
On Tuesday, 27 August 2013 at 17:35:13 UTC, qznc wrote:
I can recommand this paper (paywalled though):
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=248106
The research paper can actually be freely downloaded from
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA309412 . Good article,
thanks!
On Monday, 26 August 2013 at 19:35:28 UTC, luminousone wrote:
I have been working on a project and needed a good concurrent
queue
What does good mean? Concurrent queues have so many design
parameters (single reader? single writer? blocking? bounded? etc)
and there is no queue, which performs
On Tuesday, 27 August 2013 at 17:35:13 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Monday, 26 August 2013 at 19:35:28 UTC, luminousone wrote:
I have been working on a project and needed a good concurrent
queue
What does good mean? Concurrent queues have so many design
parameters (single reader? single writer?
