Thank Steve,
I open a new thread with some corrections, better title, etc.
On Wednesday, 31 March 2021 at 22:05:12 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/31/21 5:32 PM, ludo wrote:
[...]
ArrayBuilder should be similar in performance to Appender. I
think part of the issue with appender could
On 3/31/21 5:32 PM, ludo wrote:
Hi guys,
I am working on an old software in D1, which defines at some point an
array.d module. See my github file: https://tinyurl.com/5ffbmfvz
If you go line 347, you see an ArrayBuilder struct, which is supposed to
behave exactly like an array but with
Hi guys,
I am working on an old software in D1, which defines at some
point an array.d module. See my github file:
https://tinyurl.com/5ffbmfvz
If you go line 347, you see an ArrayBuilder struct, which is
supposed to behave exactly like an array but with faster
concatenation. The class
Thanks all. I sometimes feel like Michael Corleone: "Just when I
thought I was out, they pull me back in!" :)
I realize it is not the place for it, but sometimes I wish the
Library Reference explained things in terms of "why".
On 4/16/18 4:49 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/15/2018 11:46 PM, WhatMeForget wrote:
>
> I think I got a handle on D's static and dynamic arrays, till I come to
> std.array and see all the shiny new tools. I can understand all the
> replace.. functions, but the appender function gave me pause.
On 04/15/2018 11:46 PM, WhatMeForget wrote:
>
> I think I got a handle on D's static and dynamic arrays, till I come to
> std.array and see all the shiny new tools. I can understand all the
> replace.. functions, but the appender function gave me pause. The
> documentation says appender "Returns
I think I got a handle on D's static and dynamic arrays, till I
come to std.array and see all the shiny new tools. I can
understand all the replace.. functions, but the appender function
gave me pause. The documentation says appender "Returns a new
Appender or RefAppender initialized with a
