On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 20:04:38 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
This make me proud of being an engineer:
http://www.wimp.com/powerquadcopters/
I wonder what type system they used when modelling the
algorithms ;)
Excuse me for posting this a bit of topic...I just had to share
this experience
On Friday, 21 March 2014 at 19:59:41 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Been awhile since I updated on the Android effort: I'm now able
to get all 38 druntime modules' unit tests to pass on
Android/x86... under somewhat random conditions. It's finicky
and some of the tests start failing and many segfaulting
On Wednesday, 23 April 2014 at 15:33:36 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
So, in order to get the ball rolling on the new GC I intend to
implement for D, I want to facilitate a lively discussion of
the design of it, so that it can be designed to be both robust
and free of design flaws. To keep the
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 11:40:59 UTC, iridium wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 06:21:48 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
iridium wrote in message
news:ltcxhbcqltnltbidd...@forum.dlang.org...
Yes. optabtgen now runs correctly. Now another error. I
understand the error during assembly:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 08:18:16 UTC, iridium wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 07:55:04 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 08/05/14 08:53, iridium wrote:
That's what happens when linking:
http://itmages.ru/image/view/1655772/669acb30
You need to link with both Phobos and the C standard
Well, Android/x86 for now. I've been plugging away at getting D
running on Android/x86 and got all of the druntime modules' unit
tests and 37 of 50 phobos modules' unit tests to pass. I had to
hack dmd into producing something like packed TLS for ELF, my
patch is online here:
On Friday, 9 May 2014 at 07:21:36 UTC, iridium wrote:
I'm not asking to solve the problem for me. Just tell me what
is that. I try to building some simple executables and get this
and that: http://itmages.ru/image/view/1657447/92442093
Those are linker errors, because you are missing symbols
On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 at 18:28:09 UTC, steven kladitis wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 13:53:36 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
VC++ is Microsoft's compiler, DMD-x64 uses the de-facto
standard
Microsoft linker, since OPTLINK doesn't support 64bit.
It is available for free.
I have
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 14:15:20 UTC, Chris wrote:
Mind you, how many of the big be all end all-technologies
that have been hyped over the years are really good (including
community base projects)? JS, Java, Ajax, PHP, Ruby, iOS,
Android ...? With good I mean really good, not omnipresent.
On Monday, 19 May 2014 at 09:26:23 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Monday, 19 May 2014 at 08:20:54 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Sunday, 18 May 2014 at 22:29:04 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Undefined Behavior in C++; what is it, and why should I
care:
On Wednesday, 21 May 2014 at 00:16:07 UTC, Max Barraclough wrote:
The DMD frontend is licensed under the GPL, which is 'viral': if
your code links against it, you'll have to release your code as
GPL.
Not true, the DMD frontend is dual-licensed, both GPL and the
Artistic license:
On Wednesday, 21 May 2014 at 09:17:34 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
You can modify a GPL'ed compiler to work as a stand alone
server with shared memory interface. You are allowed to
distribute it as a binary with other kinds of software. You
don't have to make source available unless the
On Thursday, 22 May 2014 at 06:16:54 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
I recently considered making a pull request, but noticed an
include dependency that failed to work for another PR, and got
distracted. The updated compiler patches are here:
https://github.com/rainers/dmd/tree/coff32
I think this
On Thursday, 22 May 2014 at 07:45:17 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 22 May 2014 at 06:28:14 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I think this is a really important pull for win32 support,
still the most widely used platform on which D is available.
Not everybody has the source for outside libraries or the
I was reading Brad Roberts' bio before his upcoming talk today,
where he mentioned that he first heard of D because of blog posts
by Steve Yegge, when I remembered that it was likely one of Steve
Yegge's posts almost a decade ago that first brought D to my
attention, like this one:
C++ does
On Friday, 23 May 2014 at 04:11:39 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Today at DConf we learned, once again, that people are doing and
starting amazing projects using D. A lot of which wouldn't have
been possible without your contribution. So I just wanted to say
thank you.
For those who don't know
I was just googling for some info and I ran across the old web
archive:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/radical_ideas_about_GC_and_ARC_need_to_be_time_driven_231949.html
Why is this web archive being kept around? It means that there
are three different places where any
On Friday, 16 May 2014 at 19:28:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:52:43PM -0400, Nick Sabalausky via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
But then using it as a GUI engine and software platform is like
abusing Latex or PDF to make software run inside Acrobat
Viewer. All
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 15:44:22 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Although I should have known about it long ago, I have only
just become
aware of Andrei's std.benchmark, which appears in his fork of
Phobos,
but not in real Phobos. Is there an intention it should be in
Phobos,
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 18:24:57 UTC, Tom Browder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Has anyone done a survey of the primary OS of D users?
I (a D newbie) use Debian Linux (64-bit), but I get the feeling
that
many (if not most) users are on some version of Windows.
Most of those self-reporting on
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 17:34:46 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
I had a couple of things I wanted to post about the D Google
Summer of Code submission for 2015.
1.
After Andrei had asked for someone interested in taking over
the D GSOC submission for 2015, I, along with a few others of
you
I just stumbled across this year-old blog post on the Sociomantic
blog, mentioning plans to get CDGC into druntime:
https://www.sociomantic.com/blog/2013/06/porting-cdgc-to-d2/
A google search turned up this forum thread also:
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 17:34:46 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
2. Rather than wait to the last minute to start gathering
possible project ideas I thought it might be good to start
early.
Since D-Conf is just recently ended I wanted to take advantage
of the generated enthusiasm to find out if
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 15:15:46 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 23:39:02 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Nice try, but destructors called by the GC are currently
effectively @nogc. So don't try that at home.
When did that happen? Some effort was made at one point to
ensure
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 17:58:56 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 17:07:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 15:15:46 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 23:39:02 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Nice try, but destructors called by the GC are
On Sunday, 15 June 2014 at 18:50:14 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Sunday, 15 June 2014 at 11:28:12 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
http://c0de517e.blogspot.ca/2014/06/where-is-my-c-replacement.html?m=1
The arguments against D are pretty weak if I'm honest, but I
think it's important we understand what
On Wednesday, 18 June 2014 at 08:13:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
From my perspective, it is like bug reports I'd often get for
the compiler that consisted solely of:
Your compiler doesn't work.
It's just not helpful. There's nothing I can do with that.
Lol, I'd love to see your response
On Wednesday, 18 June 2014 at 09:16:32 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
From my experience, one of the reasons I haven't had much to do
with the development of dmd is simply to compile dmd, druntime
is not as straight forward as it could be.
All I can say is with ddmd make it compilable with dub
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 22:24:06 UTC, c0de517e wrote:
Visualization would be a great tool, it's quite surprising if
you think about it that we can't in any mainstream debugger
just graph over time the state of objects, create UIs and so on.
I recently did write a tiny program that does
On Thursday, 19 June 2014 at 18:10:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/19/2014 4:12 AM, Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 06/18/14 18:42, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 June 2014 at 11:09:14 UTC, Artur Skawina via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
The number of potential
On Sunday, 22 June 2014 at 16:08:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
All DMD source files mention Copyright (c) *** by Digital
Mars. As far as I understand that implies that any pull
request that does not explicitly mentions copyright does
assignment automatically. Which totally makes sense because
source
On Monday, 23 June 2014 at 17:30:19 UTC, John wrote:
The @ symbols used on all those attributes like @nogc @nothrow
@pure @safe make the D code look ugly.
If possible, please get rid of those @ symbols. The attributes
look good without the @ symbols.
I agree that it looks ugly and is a lot
On Monday, 23 June 2014 at 22:02:26 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
import std.stdio;
@safe int safe()
{
auto i = 8;
return i;
}
void main(string ars[])
{
writeln(safe);
}
---
What you want is just impossible...
Would be a good use case
On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 at 12:46:10 UTC, AG wrote:
since D has Attribute lists e.g. @(string, 7, foo, bar)
make them work with build-in attributes or convert build-in
attributes to UDA's, then you can use them as single attributes
or with attribute lists
struct pure;
struct safe;
struct
On Thursday, 26 June 2014 at 17:52:13 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 6/26/2014 7:02 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
I've increased the bounty on this bug. Fast CTFE is very
important.
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325927-ctfe-copy-on-write-is-slow-and-causes-huge-memory-usage
This
On Wednesday, 2 July 2014 at 09:13:50 UTC, Chris wrote:
Will Intel get into the mobile market in the next couple of
years? I've heard that some mobile devices are now fitted with
Intel processors. First tablets and now a Lenovo smartphone.
They've had trouble getting into smartphones, but
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 13:18:00 UTC, jim schmit wrote:
i recently sent this email to andrei. he encouraged me to post
it in this forum. here it is:
hi andrei
a colleague recently pointed me to the wired article about you
your D computer language. thought you might be interested an
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 21:30:45 UTC, Pavel wrote:
Hello!
I've reproduced steps 1-9 on my Ubuntu 14.04 x64 machine, but
now I have this errors:
root@dlang:~/phpext# dmd -shared speedup_wrap.o dfakemain.o
speedup.o -ofspeedup.so
/usr/bin/ld:
On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 15:42:04 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On 07/11/2014 05:30 PM, Chris wrote:
(...)
Believe me, D's supposed sluggishness as regards GC is
not so important for most applications. I dare say 90% of all
applications are fine with the current GC.
(...)
I agree with this. The
On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 19:56:20 UTC, Chris wrote:
I don't mean to be pessimistic about D's goal of being usable
by all, from scripting to systems, as D may actually be good
enough to get there one day. I just think you're not going to
get there without focusing on taking over a niche at a
On Friday, 11 July 2014 at 13:58:53 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Now that we have reasonable support for lexing and parsing D in
D through Dscanner/libdparse/DCD I believe it would be worth
the effort to try to implement D-specific merge algorithms that
operate on either the
- D token stream or
- a D
On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 10:27:12 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
In the end it is about community rather than the programming
language
per se. Java created a huge community that was evangelical. Go
has
rapidly created an active community that is evangelical. Python
has
rapidly
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 03:55:02 UTC, Vic wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a CTO at a start up and interested in porting our Java
project to D. Some points, I have been lurking on D for years,
went to my first D conf recently. Also I was one of top 20
people to join Java Struts, and that grew to
I've been thinking about setting one up: any interest in having
an official blog or anybody contributing? It'd have to be a
group effort, with various people writing or being interviewed.
Here's my earlier forum post that motivated the idea:
Yeah, D definitely needs better marketing. One
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 19:13:25 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 18:41:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I've been thinking about setting one up: any interest in
having an official blog or anybody contributing? It'd have to
be a group effort, with various people writing or being
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 00:41:12 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 19:41:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
whereas I'm asking about having an official blog on dlang.org
and how much interest there is from others to contribute to
one.
This is my question, what do you expect people
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 04:11:28 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 03:31:13 UTC, Pavel Evstigneev
wrote:
May I improve forum to support markdown?
The forum is actually an interface to a newsgroup, so most
forms of markdown would not be supported in the interest of
having
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 13:49:29 UTC, Pavel wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 04:11:28 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 03:31:13 UTC, Pavel Evstigneev
wrote:
May I improve forum to support markdown?
The forum is actually an interface to a newsgroup, so most
forms of
On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 22:39:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/18/14, 12:53 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-07-18 17:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Somehow the same DConf videos are of better quality on
archive.org than
on youtube.com. Could you explain that? -- Andrei
You're
On Saturday, 19 July 2014 at 03:37:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/18/14, 5:31 PM, Joakim wrote:
Do you increase the resolution of your Youtube videos when you
don't
like the quality that it's streaming?
I streamed at maximum resolution (720p) when taking those
screenshots.
Sorry,
Heh, Walter wrote a game that inspired a great deal of the
strategic gaming genre, most notably including Civilization:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classic_Empire
Other than a couple mentions in this newsgroup, I'd never heard
of this game, now available in D:
http://www.classicempire.com/
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 16:16:22 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Well, Android/x86 for now. I've been plugging away at getting
D running on Android/x86 and got all of the druntime modules'
unit tests and 37 of 50 phobos modules' unit tests to pass. I
had to hack dmd into producing something like packed
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 05:16:51 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
Is there anywhere where there is a D version of the NPAPI. I
tried using htod with and without the cpp flag with no sucess
Why would you want to use NPAPI at this point? IE hasn't
supported it in a long time, and Chrome is
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 01:29:39 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
On 7/28/2014 6:01 AM, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 05:16:51 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
Is there anywhere where there is a D version of the NPAPI. I
tried
using htod with and without the cpp flag with no sucess
Why would
On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 08:12:17 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 30/07/2014 7:03 p.m., Kagamin wrote:
Making dmd generate coff would make more sense.
+1
Most of the code should already be present in dmd, which makes
it far crazier not to.
What makes it craziest is that there's a
On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 09:06:11 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 30/07/2014 8:58 p.m., Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 08:12:17 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 30/07/2014 7:03 p.m., Kagamin wrote:
Making dmd generate coff would make more sense.
+1
Most of the code should
On Thursday, 24 July 2014 at 01:17:44 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I'll start cleaning up my fairly simple build process and
document it on the wiki, so that others can easily play with D
on Android/x86.
Finally cleaned up my build process a bit and wrote it up on the
wiki:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 00:10:21 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
Hi,
I just won a three-month-long programming contest (Al
Zimmermann's Programming Contest - Alphabet City) using the D
programming language as my main tool. I want to share my
happiness, and express my deep gratitude, to the
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 17:19:40 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
Indeed, you seem to be right that these points can be converted
to a text of some interest to general audience. But that's a
task for a few weeks later, as I'm busy with other stuff until
the beginning of September.
No hurry.
C++ support keeps coming up these days, with Andrei continually
stressing it as something to work on. How hard would it to be to
write a C++-D translator, to allow people to translate C++
libraries to D?
I've been using tools like DStep and looking at libdparse, which
seem to work very
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 10:00:43 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Joakim wrote in message
news:ysntkmioyndreuiiy...@forum.dlang.org...
C++ support keeps coming up these days, with Andrei
continually stressing it as something to work on. How hard
would it to be to write a C++-D translator,
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 21:06:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/21/2014 10:57 AM, Joakim wrote:
Given tools like libclang, how hard do you think it'd be to
translate most of
actual C++ to D?
I'd say the possibility of that is about zero. Heck, we can't
even do it 100% for C.
The
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 04:03:17 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:33:00 +
via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I think the whole separate compilation idea is going to be old
fashioned real soon now. It makes little sense to not have the
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 19:19:48 UTC, Sativa wrote:
I think it would be helpful to have the d lang site host
tutorials/lessons on various aspects of D. D is hard to use for
certain things like gui's, graphics(ogl, dx, etc), etc... not
necessarily because D can't do these things but
On Sunday, 31 August 2014 at 04:25:11 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
And I *do* appreciate that GPL, unlike BSD, can *realistically*
be cross-licensed with a commercial license in a meaningful way
and used on paid commercial software (at least, I *think* so,
based on what little anyone actually
On Sunday, 31 August 2014 at 09:37:35 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:23:24 +
Joakim via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
As such, his GPL, which doesn't allow such pragmatic mixing of
open and closed source, is
...a great thing to stop invasion
On Sunday, 31 August 2014 at 10:14:05 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
And last but not least, the Wiki has lots of tutorials, though
again it's IMO not discoverable enough:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Articles
http://wiki.dlang.org/Tutorials
You're moving the goal posts. He specifically asked about D
On Sunday, 31 August 2014 at 10:30:24 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
There is some precedent for a commercial software package to be
released like this:
This is available under either a commercial license or GPL.
You can freely download and use the software and its source
code, at no cost,
On Sunday, 31 August 2014 at 19:58:03 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Could be. That is a fairly convincing article, at least for the
time limit version of mixed closed/open.
Glad to hear that. :) Nobody has really tried my time-limited
version, which I believe is the final step.
But in any
On Sunday, 31 August 2014 at 22:06:09 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
GPL can be summarised in four simple freedoms. Nothing
complicated there.
The problems come up when you get into the details of how to
write those freedoms into legalese, for example, the whole
dynamic linking
On Monday, 1 September 2014 at 01:20:02 UTC, Abe wrote:
If anybody with a Windows installation of DMD would care to
chime in, I`d be interested to read what that side of the
triangle looks like vis-a-vis the linking and
size-of-executable issue/issues.
The Windows version of dmd 2.067 seems
On Monday, 1 September 2014 at 06:07:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The Windows version of dmd 2.067 seems to do a better job, with
the executable coming in at 144 KB for the 32-bit version
linked with optlink and 270 KB for the 64-bit version linked
with the MS linker.
Sorry, I measured with the
On Monday, 1 September 2014 at 07:36:44 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 1 September 2014 at 06:07:39 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The Windows version of dmd 2.067 seems to do a better job,
with the executable coming in at 144 KB for the 32-bit version
linked with optlink and 270 KB for the 64-bit version
I was googling around for information on ninja, the build system
used by the Chromium project, when I stumbled across this
interesting article about how it was optimized for performance:
http://aosabook.org/en/posa/ninja.html
I also read these two from that site, the latter of which I think
On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 10:23:58 UTC, po wrote:
The first link says that Chrome is a *90* meg binary! Gawd
damn. Either they write some really bloated code, or modern
browsers require way too much shit to function.
The latter.
On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 10:34:05 UTC, ketmar
On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 11:19:09 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 10:23:58 UTC, po wrote:
The first link says that Chrome is a *90* meg binary! Gawd
damn. Either they write some really bloated code, or modern
browsers require way too much shit to function.
The
Just ran across this talk and blog post from earlier this year,
interesting how they leveraged the great concurrency of erlang
and efficiency and instrumentability of FreeBSD to build a highly
scalable mobile chat app with few servers and a very small team:
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 09:29:48 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 01:30:02 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrew Edwards has done a great job with the recent release,
but needs to step down because he's busy with other pursuits.
We need a release lieutenant who would
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 15:09:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Bullshit. Any kind of forking wastes most valuable resource
open source world can possibly have - developer attention. In
limited form it is compensated by ecnouraged competition and
breaking possible stagantion. When it becomes
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 23:48:54 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 23:39:17 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Because original post had no learning context at all. I would
gladly support initiative to provide more example-based
tutorials for DMD contribution. Or any call for feedback
On Wednesday, 10 September 2014 at 18:58:58 UTC, Ryan Voots wrote:
An article today about the garbage collector and the ensuing
discussion from it
http://pointersgonewild.wordpress.com/2014/09/09/ds-garbage-collector-problem/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8297091
On Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 12:26:39 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
I am not here to increase my self worth, though I don't mind an
educated argument or a role playing stunt, I am here to
increase the probability of having a programming language that
is better than the alternatives for
On Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 15:24:41 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
there is no D committee (thanks to all existing and
inexisting gods
for that!), so the only source of trust is compiler
developer(s). if
compiler developers avoid using new features, those features
aren't
blessed,
On Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 18:32:10 UTC, Daniel Alves
wrote:
You know, currently I spend most of my time programming in
ObjC, but I really love C, C++ and D.
Since the Clang Compiler, ObjC dropped the GC entirely. Yes,
that's right, no GC at all. And, in fact, it does support
On Saturday, 13 September 2014 at 20:10:55 UTC, eles wrote:
This presentation:
https://parasol.tamu.edu/people/bs/622-GP/C++14TAMU.pdf
He criticizes C99 VLA (slide 24) as being an abomination
But the surprise comes at the end (slide 57), where he also
criticizes... the static if as being a
On Saturday, 13 September 2014 at 21:54:19 UTC, po wrote:
Heh, I like how he says static if was proposed by Walter
Brown. ;)
Is it just me or did it seem like most of the stuff in those
slides is already in D? I don't follow C++.
Walter Brown is a real person;)
Ah, I now see that he
On Tuesday, 16 September 2014 at 11:55:02 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
I also think that the GPL would be a more fitting license for
D, given the democratic process and the community aspect.
But I would not modify the source then. So the license sure
matters. MIT/BSD has traditionally been
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 17:37:27 UTC, Cliff wrote:
The study doesn't analyze D, but the relationships between
languages may be interesting and in some cases surprising.
http://se.inf.ethz.ch/people/nanz/research/rosettacode.html
NOTE: The link contains only a summary, there is a
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 19:38:37 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Joakim:
I wonder why they found Haskell to be so slow, I thought it
was compiled.
The first reason for the performance of programs is how much
care the programmer has to write a fast program, secondly how
good the chosen
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 21:35:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 24 September 2014 19:22, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I don't know how DMD compiles rt.lifetime successfully.
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 21:54:12 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Joakim:
So Haskell programmers don't care about fast programs and
don't know how to choose good algorithms? ;)
Haskell programmers that write the Rosettacode entries usually
care for code succinctness and code simplicity
On Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 03:55:22 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I make similar statements all the time. It doesn't result in
action on anyone's part. I don't tell people what to do - they
work on aspects of D that interest them.
Even people who ask me what to work on never follow my
On Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 07:28:10 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
If you have a passion and interest in this space and would
like to
collaborate, I would be thrilled. We can also split this
discussion
off of this thread since it is not D specific.
I'm interested. What about Atila?
On Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 17:06:48 UTC, Tourist wrote:
Of the failing platforms:
OSX32: https://github.com/braddr/d-tester/pull/35 (OSX32 is
crazy)
...
So, this is fixed now, right?
Yep.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3970
On Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 13:56:20 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/25/14, 4:30 AM, Joakim wrote:
I'm sorry but it's ridiculous for you two co-BDFLs not to put
these new priorities or pre-approved features (perhaps even a
list of features you'd automatically reject) in a list on the
On Saturday, 27 September 2014 at 17:06:53 UTC, Etienne wrote:
On 2014-09-27 12:25 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
You mentioned Botan. I already have a C++ = D Wrapper project
going
over here: https://github.com/ellipticbit/titanium
I am working out a bug where the memory corrupts itself when
On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 04:15:24 UTC, Andre Kostur wrote:
I ran across mention of a JavaScript compiler written in D on
the ACM TechNews...
https://github.com/maximecb/Higgs
Yes, that article was mentioned here a week ago:
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 04:39:03 UTC, John A wrote:
Not sure where to post this; it's not a question, just some
info.
I have created a set of pages here:
http://arrizza.org/wiki/index.php/Dlang
with instructions which include:
- how to create a GDC cross-compiler using crosstool-ng
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 02:24:45 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
On 2014-10-05 03:33:36 +, Walter Bright said:
We're not really limited by lack of funds, but more by lack of
focussed effort. If anyone wants to contribute funds, probably
the best use would be to add bug bounties for
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 13:54:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/6/14, 5:42 AM, Wyatt wrote:
On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 16:14:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
No need to explain it here. When I speak about vision I mean
something
that anyone coming to dlang.org page or GitHub repo sees.
1 - 100 of 1491 matches
Mail list logo