On Monday, 12 May 2014 at 00:50:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/11/2014 1:59 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
Borrowed pointers are not even superficially similar to near*.
They are
compatible with everything else, because they can store data
that was borrowed
from anywhere else.
As long as those
On Monday, 12 May 2014 at 08:10:43 UTC, Tommi wrote:
Perhaps: [..]
Somewhat surprisingly to me, you can later on change the borrowed
pointer in the mutable static 'Test' to point at a mutable static
int:
struct Test {
n: 'static int
}
static old: int = 111;
static mut new: int = 222;
On Sunday, 11 May 2014 at 21:43:06 UTC, sclytrack wrote:
I like this owner/unique, borrow thing.
@ is managed (currently reference counted)
~ is owner
is borrow
I like it too. But a few notes:
1) The managed pointer @T has been deprecated and you should use
the standard library types GcT
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 21:16:55 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05/13/2014 09:07 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-05-13 15:56, Dicebot wrote:
Judging by
http://static.rust-lang.org/doc/0.6/tutorial-macros.html
those are not full-blown AST macros like ones you have been
proposing,
more like
I see a lot of people arguing a lot about D and sorry to say
but at times it sounds like a kindergarten. Walter/Andrei are
right that updates and changes need to be focused on the
standard library.
Improve the standard library!
Some of the proposals sounds very correct. The library needs to
On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 05:59:35 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
[..]
http://video.fosdem.org/2014/K4401/Sunday/LDC_the_LLVMbased_D_compiler.webm
I can't watch this on my iPhone.
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 09:14:18 UTC, Alix Pexton wrote:
On 27/05/2014 1:15 PM, Tommi wrote:
On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 05:59:35 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
[..]
http://video.fosdem.org/2014/K4401/Sunday/LDC_the_LLVMbased_D_compiler.webm
I can't watch this on my iPhone.
