Re: [OT] Bitcoin's Split Is Good for Progress
On Monday, 7 August 2017 at 23:45:13 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 at 16:21:41 UTC, jmh530 wrote: I was surprised to see a familiar name here: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-02/bitcoin-s-split-is-good-for-progress Here's an interview with Amaury about the Bitcoin split: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/future-bitcoin-cash-interview-bitcoin-abc-lead-developer-amaury-séchet/ I've been meaning to interview him for the D blog, about D of course, need to get around to that. I guess we can do that now, but as you can imagine, i was pretty busy :)
Re: [OT] Bitcoin's Split Is Good for Progress
On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 at 16:21:41 UTC, jmh530 wrote: I was surprised to see a familiar name here: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-02/bitcoin-s-split-is-good-for-progress Here's an interview with Amaury about the Bitcoin split: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/future-bitcoin-cash-interview-bitcoin-abc-lead-developer-amaury-séchet/ I've been meaning to interview him for the D blog, about D of course, need to get around to that.
Re: [OT] Bitcoin's Split Is Good for Progress
On Wednesday, 2 August 2017 at 19:00:05 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 08/02/2017 09:21 AM, jmh530 wrote: I was surprised to see a familiar name here: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-02/bitcoin-s-split-is-good-for-progress "They -- led by former Facebook developer Amaury Sechet -- moved ahead with new software that would increase the maximum block size to 8 MB." Ali We won't stop to 8 :)
Re: [OT] Bitcoin's Split Is Good for Progress
On 08/02/2017 09:21 AM, jmh530 wrote: I was surprised to see a familiar name here: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-08-02/bitcoin-s-split-is-good-for-progress "They -- led by former Facebook developer Amaury Sechet -- moved ahead with new software that would increase the maximum block size to 8 MB." Ali