Re: Any front end experts n da house?
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 22:38:33 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 22:16:38 UTC, tsbockman wrote: Yes. The path to fix 259 is clear, and Lionello Lunesu and myself have already done most of the work. 14835 is a blocker due to the nature of the solution that Walter and Andrei approved (which I agree is the right one); an independent implementation would run in to the same problem. Great news! Only if that blocker is dealt with - otherwise it's just wasted effort...
Re: Any front end experts n da house?
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 22:16:38 UTC, tsbockman wrote: On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 16:36:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 10/12/2016 12:31 PM, Stefan Koch wrote: I can take a look at 259. 14835 is nothing trivial though. My understanding is Thomas has an attack on 259 once a solution to 14835 is up. -- Andrei Yes. The path to fix 259 is clear, and Lionello Lunesu and myself have already done most of the work. 14835 is a blocker due to the nature of the solution that Walter and Andrei approved (which I agree is the right one); an independent implementation would run in to the same problem. Great news!
Re: Any front end experts n da house?
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 16:36:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 10/12/2016 12:31 PM, Stefan Koch wrote: I can take a look at 259. 14835 is nothing trivial though. My understanding is Thomas has an attack on 259 once a solution to 14835 is up. -- Andrei Yes. The path to fix 259 is clear, and Lionello Lunesu and myself have already done most of the work. 14835 is a blocker due to the nature of the solution that Walter and Andrei approved (which I agree is the right one); an independent implementation would run in to the same problem.
Re: Any front end experts n da house?
On 10/12/2016 12:31 PM, Stefan Koch wrote: I can take a look at 259. 14835 is nothing trivial though. My understanding is Thomas has an attack on 259 once a solution to 14835 is up. -- Andrei
Re: Any front end experts n da house?
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 16:27:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: So it would be great to get the super annoying https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259 to a conclusion, and it seems the similarly annoying https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14835 is in the way. If anyone would like to look into the latter that would be great. Good regression testing (e.g. on dub projects) would be necessary. Andrei I can take a look at 259. 14835 is nothing trivial though.
