Re: [digitalradio] Winlink take over?

2005-04-05 Thread Paul L Schmidt
They both use SSB transmissions, and it's quite true that SSTV is not data -- SSTV is image, and the U.S. phone bands are designated voice/image and data. It is still illegal in the U.S. to be on a voice frequency and say OK, Bob, Here's the data you need: [multi- tone beeps for 20 seconds]

[digitalradio] Re: Winlink take over?

2005-04-05 Thread Skip Teller
Message: 19 Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:39:06 -0500 From: Rick Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Winlink take over? Skip, With all due respect, (and you have considerable), it seems that some of the arguments may be counter productive and may in some cases affect the survival of amateur

[digitalradio] Re: Winlink take over?

2005-04-05 Thread Joel Kolstad
I think that one of the reasons there's so much contention over Winlink is that it DOES work as well as it does... IMO, the ability to pass e-mail back to _the Internet_ is what people want, and while PSK31, Olivia, and all the other 'chat mode' protocols and even packet BBSes are a lot of

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink take over?

2005-04-05 Thread John Becker
I take it you ham been a ham for 10 years or less ? Or just don't remember per internet and all those packet system all running unattended.. Then came pactor as to what is in now. John, WØJAB At 01:01 PM 4/5/05, you wrote: I think this opinion is false-to-fact. IMO, most Hams want direct,

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Winlink take over?

2005-04-05 Thread John Becker
I also have been a BBS SYSOP since 1983 First running on a 64k radio shack system and later the MSYS... Sorry if I got you all up-set man At 04:46 PM 4/5/05, you wrote: I was first licensed in 1952, and have been an alternate sysop on a packet BBS, Thank you. Your rash assumptions may