[digitalradio] Re Stream

2005-10-05 Thread Bernard Spencer
Hello Nino, I use your Stream V.1.1 program, which is nice. Because the MFSK16 mode in general is not always easy to tune, I think it would help stations receiving me if my Idle Tone at the beginning of each transmission was a bit longer than the 1 second default. Perhaps two or three seconds

[digitalradio] olivia/chirp beacon

2005-10-05 Thread David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
a non legal thought its not gonna be much of a mode test, if you are on a dead band...6/10 if you are in attendance, then why not just call cq a bunch. text: cq cq cq (mode) test transmission. please qrx or send e-mail to ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AR don't think this will break any laws, and

[digitalradio] Fw: [chip64] Hw about a Chip Weekend

2005-10-05 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
- Original Message - From: Stan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 5:14 PM Subject: [chip64] Hw about a Chip Weekend I would like to proposed a Chip64 weekend. It would give us a chance to try out the software and meet each other.I would like to suggest Oct

RE: [digitalradio] Fw: [chip64] Hw about a Chip Weekend

2005-10-05 Thread Rick Williams
Could some one explain the advantage of CHIP 64 over other modes? Thus far I have found, along with others that haveworked with the mode, nothing to differentiate it. It does not work as well as MFSK16 on difficult/noisy paths such as nighttime 80 meters. Are there cases where it does

[digitalradio] ARRL forwarding tagged as spam.

2005-10-05 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
We have found that some of the people that use email addresses supplied by the ARRL, e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] , ( an email forwarding service) are not getting some messages. Seems that the ARRL new anti-spam program is tagging a lot of things a spam when in fact it's not. Those of you that use

[digitalradio] Re: Olivia announcement page

2005-10-05 Thread Steve Burczyk
Maybe you stirred up the nest, Rich. The W6RK site has spots now from several stations dated 10/04/05. But not much activity for awhile before today. Maybe we're doing more listening than posting..? 73's All Steve KE8PA --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [digitalradio] ARRL forwarding tagged as spam.

2005-10-05 Thread Harv Nelson
Hi Andy Below, a copy of an Email I sent to Barry J. Shelley, N1VXY, Chief Financial Officer and Business Manager, ARRL, Inc. on September 1 ... just a day or two after they announced their new service. Seems my apprehension was well grounded. Harv === My note to

Re: [digitalradio] Fw: [chip64] Hw about a Chip Weekend

2005-10-05 Thread KT2Q
Rick, I've only had a few QSO's with Chip, but I think it will find aniche.Onemajor obstacleisthe polar ionosphere and Chip seeems to do as well as MFSK and Olivia in that respect. Chip128 is especially goodthrough Moe Wheatley's canned simulation for high-latitudeconditions, but I

Re: [digitalradio] ARRL forwarding tagged as spam. (a bit OT)

2005-10-05 Thread Harv Nelson
On 10/6/05, John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good points Harv. But I fail to see why anyone would use such an address as their primary email address. Matter of personal choice ... I have other addresses I use for other purposes. My ISP (sitting across the room from me) is set up in

Re: [digitalradio] ARRL forwarding tagged as spam.

2005-10-05 Thread Dean Gibson AE7Q
Assuming that spam filtering is automatically based on content is very naive; accusing someone of trying to restrict what you read based on that assumption is silly. I run my own mail server that has one of the most restrictive mail filters on the planet, and not one iota of the filters is